Bug#924179: Package: installation-reports

2019-03-09 Thread Tom Thekathyil
Package: installation-reports Boot method: DVD Image version: https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/firmware-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso Date: 2019-03-10 noon (AU) Machine: Desktop Processor: Ryzen 3 2200G/Vega 8 Memory: 2x4gb ddr4 te

Bug#924047: FTBFS: package don't build successful after new GCC version

2019-03-09 Thread أحمد المحمودي
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 09:43:17PM +0100, Carsten Schoenert wrote: > the systemc package is currently failing to build from source basically > related due a newer GCC version and changed symbols introduced by the > newer GCC. > > I've fixed the reason of the FTBFS by modifying and adopting the > s

Bug#924139: www.debian.org: migrate from python to python3

2019-03-09 Thread 황병희
On Sat, Mar 09 2019, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > ...snip... > point, as Python 2 is on the way out. Well i'm not position to resolve it. However that is very very very dangerous i think. Anyhow, it is interesting PR, to me. Sincerely, Byung-Hee. -- Still i'm waiting for Debian 11 -- ^Bullseye_^))/

Bug#917738: patch

2019-03-09 Thread Joe Lee
tag 917738 + patch thanks Hi, here's a patch for bug #917738 that I extracted from upstream. Description: remove WebServiceException Origin: upstream, https://github.com/OpenHFT/Chronicle-Threads/commit/bb1d4edfc7a783ebdc7c58bfc2f278f665e2539e#diff-e5af304c7efa4fec7930553b2fab754b Index: openhft-c

Bug#924027: unblock: extsmail/2.2-4

2019-03-09 Thread Olivier Girondel
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 15:43:51 + Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 02:40:48PM +0100, Olivier Girondel wrote: > > Please unblock extsmail. > > > > I uploaded a new version of extsmail, which reset the package's > > transition countdown, whi

Bug#924180: file-roller: Trims files extracted from iso images

2019-03-09 Thread pavel
Package: file-roller Version: 3.30.1-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? I tried to extract files

Bug#924181: unblock: llvm-toolchain-6.0/1:6.0.1-11

2019-03-09 Thread Mo Zhou
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package llvm-toolchain-6.0 -- Summary -- * Remove 'Multi-Arch: same' in libclang (Closes: #874248) * Cherry-pick various llvm fixes for Julia (Closes: #919628) * Rebase a

Bug#924182: [pre-approval] unblock: julia/1.0.3+dfsg-5

2019-03-09 Thread Mo Zhou
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock This is a pre-approval for unblocking julia 1.0.3+dfsg-5, which follows the unblock request for llvm-toolchain-6.0 (= 1:6.0.1-11). The difference between julia/testing and julia/1.0.3+dfsg-

Bug#924183: postfix: Trust anchor files (tafile=) in TLS policy break secure level email delivery

2019-03-09 Thread intrigeri
Package: postfix Version: 3.4.1-1 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, I have entries like this: [domain.tld]:587secure tafile=/etc/ssl/certs/Lets-Encrypt-Authority-X3.pem … in the file referenced by: smtp_tls_policy_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/tls_policy This worked just fine until 3.3.2

Bug#924184: no help for download template?

2019-03-09 Thread Harald Dunkel
Package: lxc Version: 1:3.1.0+really3.0.3-5 Running lxc-create -t download -- --help I had expected to get usage information about the download template, but instead I got a huge list of images. Next it showed Distribution: and got unresponsive. Exit with ^C or ^D. Apparently it

Bug#924047: FTBFS: package don't build successful after new GCC version

2019-03-09 Thread Carsten Schoenert
Am 10.03.19 um 05:39 schrieb أحمد المحمودي: > I'd rather remove the symbols file. That's the last option in my eyes as it's a step backwards and is absolutely not needed as I fixed the problem already. The main problem with the symbols is that the symbols are simply not versioned and that's an up

Bug#919929: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929)

2019-03-09 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2019-03-10 03:51, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi Drew, On 08-03-2019 03:08, Drew Parsons wrote: On 2019-03-07 20:46, Paul Gevers wrote: If you upload now, your package will not migrate to testing before the full freeze becomes effective so it would need an unblock. If you want to fix this issue wit

<    1   2   3   4