On December 24, 2016 7:24:00 PM PST, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Andres Salomon wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the patch. Given that OLPC isn't really alive any more,
>> I'm thinking the OLPC packages should probably just be removed from
>the
>> archive for Stretch. Popcon show
Hi, Andreas,
على السبت 24 كانون الأول 2016 11:34، كتب Andreas Tille:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 07:24:22AM -0800, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
>> I'm really sad to see the duplication of effort when I was so
>> particular to make sure my work was pushed :(. Is there a way we can
>> avoid this in the futu
Hi Tomas!
On 24/12/16 16:40, Thomas Renard wrote:
What version where you updating from?
it was 0.9.4c-4 and yes, I needed to change my configs with upgrading to
0.9.4xxx some weeks ago.
OK, that should rule out a lot of things...
> etc/lirc/lircd.conf.dist [Errno 2] Datei oder Verzeich
Package: actiona
Version: 3.9.2-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
- Nothing. It didn't work after installing.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
* Package name: python-shutilwhich
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Marc Brinkmann
* URL : https://github.com/mbr/shutilshich
* License : Python-3
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Hello.
Any progress?
--
Best Regards,
Yuri Kozlov
Package: libpam-mount
Version: 2.16-1
See the Ubuntu patch:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/287089358/libpam-mount_2.14-2_2.14-2ubuntu1.diff.gz
--- libpam-mount-2.14/debian/rules 2016-09-27 09:40:33.0 +
+++ libpam-mount-2.14/debian/rules 2016-09-28 14:34:08.0 +
@@ -1,6 +1,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016, at 07:29 AM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
>
> * Package name: python-shutilwhich
> Version : 1.1.0
> Upstream Author : Marc Brinkmann
> * URL : https://github.com/mbr/s
Hi Julian
I am then asking for advice.
On 12/25/16 01:00, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> If you want to use the aptsources module or a software based on it,
> I can only advise you not to use the deb822 format.
I am currently working on autopkgtest in scope of support for gating
autopkgtests for u
Package: postsrsd
Severity: wishlist
Upstream version 1.4 is available for a year. Please consider packaging
it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.11
APT prefers oldstable-updates
APT policy: (640, 'oldstable-updates'), (640, 'oldstable-proposed-updates'),
(640, 'oldstable')
Architect
Hi Afif,
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 09:47:56PM -0800, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
> > Its no real problem. I think it will not happen to frequently since the
> > situation to save package for upcoming releases is only every second
> > year - perhaps posting the fact you are working in a separate branch
>
Source: wireguard
Version: 0.0.20161223-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
Wireguard appears to be stable and reliable enough to distribute in
debian unstable, to get more widespread testing than would arise from
distribution in experimental alone.
However, t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
on amd64 bino wasn't built in a clean environment causing it to depend on
unavailable libraries,
so please rebuild it for this architecture.
Thanks
nmu bino_1.6.5-1 . amd64 . unsta
Hi Ole,
> the attached patch fixes the FTBFS. What is the schedule to fix the
> other problems with statsimage -- especially pandas?
I learned that NeuroDebian is happy about team uploads / NMUs - so
I think its fine if you upload your patch.
Kind regards
Andreas.
PS: If you are not co
201 - 214 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
