Bug#824449: firefox: FTBFS on sparc64 due to wrong platform definitions

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:06:06PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Thus, in order to fix this issue on sparc64/Linux, a more elaborate > fix will have to be developed. I just made a test installation of NetBSD to verify the theory. On Linux: glaubitz@ikarus:~$ cat vmtest.c #include #

Bug#822210: sdl2-config.cmake: extra leading / trailing whitespace

Hi On 05/19/2016 07:10 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > Hi! > > 2016-05-01 15:42 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo: >> >> If it needs this change, I think that my solution is not very robust >> and that the assumptions made don't work and can fail in other cases. > > So I've been fighting

Bug#822693: Safe Defaults / Automatic Protection

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:59:07AM +0200, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > > Manually running firecfg also does not work for software that has profiles > > but where the package gets installed by the user after firejail was > > installed. I speculate for reasons of cleanness, it does not be create > > syml

Bug#818990: Is it really a flint problem?

It still fails on reproducible builds on the "armhf" architecture, but only in testing, and the way it fails is now completely different than the way it failed on amd64 in the initial report.

Bug#824898: Failed to start Load/Save Screen Backlight Brightness of backlight

Package: systemd Version: 229-5 Right after start I saw on tty1: [FAILED] Failed to start Load/Save Screen Backlight Brightness of backlight:acpi_video0. See 'systemctl status systemd-backlight@backlight:acpi_video0.service' for details. So let us see the output of the aforementioned command

Bug#824899: tracker.debian.org: broken non-Latin scripts support? (testing migrations section)

Package: tracker.debian.org Dear Maintainer, perhaps it has somewhat broken non-Latin scripts support; please look at the "testing migrations" section here: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/harfbuzz (Screenshot attached for history). -- Best wishes, Bob

Bug#824900: RFS: iroffer-dinoex/3.30-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "iroffer-dinoex" Package name: iroffer-dinoex Version : 3.30-1 Upstream Author : Dirk Meyer URL : http://iroffer.dinoex.net License : GPL-2 Section

Bug#774765: ITP: php-oci8 -- Extension for Oracle Database

hello Petter, 2016-05-20 16:53 GMT+02:00 Petter Reinholdtsen : > Hi. Is the source for this package in some version control directory > somewhere? Yes, of course: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-php/php-oci8.git >Any idea why it take so long for the package to get accepted > or rejected? E

Bug#824817: [Pkg-clamav-devel] Bug#824817: Please include bytecode.cvd in one .deb

esn't 2016-05-20 23:11 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior : > On 2016-05-20 07:05:11 [+0200], Mathieu Parent wrote: >> Hi, > Hi, Hi, thanks for your quick answer. >> There is no offline way to test clamav. I need this to ensure c-icap is >> working properly using autopkgtest. >> >> I propose th

Bug#497342: nvi: Bug exists in stable: 1.81.6-8.2 but not in 1.79-26

Package: nvi Followup-For: Bug #497342 Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? I ran apt-get upgrade and nvi was upgraded. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? I tried to run a bash script that I was editing (my standard pr

Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

On 14-05-2016 20:45, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 12:22:13AM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >> On 13-05-2016 11:46, Adam Borowski wrote: On 10-05-2016 02:43, Lucas Castro wrote > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsm" > > dget -x > https://mentors.

Bug#497342: nvi: Bug exists in stable: 1.81.6-8.2 but not in 1.79-2 more

Package: nvi Followup-For: Bug #497342 Dear Maintainer, I searched quite a bit before posting this, I noticed that in recover.c there was a comment saying that this should be O_RDONLY but blah.. and used O_RDWR. I am not sure if that is important or not. Thanks, Jim -- System Information: D

Bug#824826: ITP: python-cement -- CLI Application Framework

On 20-May-2016, Michael Fladischer wrote: > Cement is an advanced CLI Application Framework for Python. Its > goal is to introduce a standard, and feature-full platform for both > simple and complex command line applications as well as support > rapid development needs without sacrificing quali

Bug#818249: line 14: all `Format' sections are invalid.

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo unreproducible On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:35:00 +0100 Manolo =?UTF-8?B?RMOtYXo=?= wrote: > On Wednesday, 16 Mar 2016 at 15:52 UTC > Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:16:56AM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > > > # install-docs --verbose

Bug#807377: binutils: build for N32 and MIPS r6

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 20.05.2016 14:14, YunQiang Su wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 7:34 PM, YunQiang Su wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: On 15.05.2016 14:56, YunQiang Su wrote: > > > As in dpkg

Bug#824901: gnupg: gpg segfaults

Package: gnupg Version: 2.1.12-1 Severity: normal Hi! GPG seems to reproducibly segfault on the command below (at least on my box). I had a segfault on gpg --import earlier as well but couln't reproduce after installing debug symbols Christoph % gdb --args gpg --list-sigs 0x3B78A32D98BAD5B0

Bug#824902: tar: -X / --exclude-from silent failure

Package: tar Version: 1.29-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, the -X / --exclude-from option silently fails in 1-29-1. Consider this example (see attached tar file): The file "includes" contains: base The file "excludes" contains: dir-2 dir-glob-* With tar 1.28-2.2, the patterns listed in "

Bug#806740: tracker.debian.org: Please add AppStream hints panel

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I don't think that you should use a link and an action item for the same > purpose. I would keep only the action item. I think the link in the tracker should point at the metainfo pages and those metainfo pages should point at the issues

Bug#824902: tar: -X / --exclude-from silent failure

And although -X / --exclude-from is missing from the latest man page, it is still documented in the HTML manual: https://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/html_section/tar_49.html Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Director Transient Software Limited New Zealand

Bug#824902: tar: -X / --exclude-from silent failure

And it makes no difference if "base/" is prepended to the patterns in "excludes", the same behaviour is observed: success in 1.28-2.2 and failure in 1.29-1. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Director Transient Software Limited New Zealand

Bug#824903: letsencrypt.sh: Letsencrypt.sh broken due to "pretty" json used in Let's Encrypt API

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Package: letsencrypt.sh Version: 0.1.0-2~bpo8+1 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/letsencrypt.sh Hi, I'm testing this using the backports package, but I guess the problem applies to sid as well (same version). Recently letsencrypt.org changed to ret

Bug#824806: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#824806: Bug#824806: golang: random_build_path_by_golang_compiler is #824806

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:54:58AM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > FWIW my impression is that this issue has been addressed upstream and will > be fixed in the 1.7 release, but maybe someone should check? According to https://github.com/golang/go/issues/13247 this issue has been fixed in comm

Bug#774765: ITP: php-oci8 -- Extension for Oracle Database

[Mathieu Parent] > Yes, of course: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-php/php-oci8.git Very good. I had a look at the debian/copyright files using debmake and license-reconcile, and both reported no serious issue with it. So that part should be solid enough. Could there be a license issue with

Bug#824904: bugs.debian.org: auto-fix common usertags mistakes

Package: bugs.debian.org Severity: wishlist I'm currently running the attached script to report common issues with the way some folks use BTS usertags, mostly simple things like using debian.org instead of debian.rog. I think it would be more appropriate for these fixes to be run automatically by

Bug#806542: liblinux-prctl-perl: autopkgtest failures: seccomp, capbset

Hi, On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 09:03:30PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 07:22:01PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > > Package: liblinux-prctl-perl > > > Version: 1.6.0-2 > > > > This package recently started failing its autopkgtest checks on > > > ci.debian.net: > > >

Bug#774744: ITP: obs -- Open Broadcast Software

[Sebastian Ramacher] > It's in NEW waiting to be processed. Right. I ran 'debmake -k' to check the copyright file, and it discovered a few issues that perhaps should be looked into: === debian/copyright checked for 2051 data === Pattern #00: * File: plugins/mac-syphon/data/syphon_license.txt -

Bug#824905: RM: libzeromq-perl -- ROM; deprecated and will most likely not be ported to newer zeromq versions

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org Usertags: zrh2016 Control: block 818998 by -1 Control: tags 818998 - moreinfo Hi Please remove libzeromq-perl from unstable. It blocks the removal of zeromq itself (#818998). The libzeromq-perl module is considered deprec

Bug#824906: dolphin: sudo dolphin doesnt work correctly

Package: dolphin Version: 4:15.08.3-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, When running sudo dolphin, it starts in unusable form without style and icons. Output of Konsole: ... QPainter::begin: Paint device returned engine == 0, type: 2 QPainter::setOpacity: Painter not active QPainter::begin:

Bug#824907: ruby-reek: Fails to load library from main script

Package: ruby-reek Version: 3.8.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, When I run reek from the ruby-reek package, I get the following error: /usr/bin/reek:9:in `require_relative': cannot load such file -- /usr/lib/reek (LoadError) from /usr/bin/reek:9:in `'

Bug#824826: ITP: python-cement -- CLI Application Framework

Hi Ben, On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 11:39 +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Thank you for announcing your intent to package this. I'm interested > in helping, would you like a co-maintainer? thanks for offering your support. I'm already maintaining this as part of the DPMT, so if you want, you can join me the

Bug#824696: [debhelper-devel] Bug#824696: debhelper: dh_perl should report perl:any when unversioned

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Javier Serrano Polo: > Package: debhelper > Version: 9.20160403 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > Unversioned dependencies (no binary modules) should be architecture > independent (perl:any). > > [...] Hi, I had a short chat with Helmut about this and it is not o

Bug#824908: apt: inconsistent “header” terminology throughout documentation, comments, messages

Package: apt Version: 1.2.12 Severity: minor The code base for APT uses the term “header” in several distinct ways. The following usages correctly refer to the singular content at the head of some data stream: * The singular header of a binary file, such as an AR archive. * The singular header

Bug#824909: changes for the libonig transition

Source: lua-rexlib Version: 2.7.2-3 Severity: normal Tags: patch -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, at the new libonig package the program onig-config is removed. You can replace it with pkg-config. A patch is attached. CU Jörg - -- System Information: Debian Release: stret

Bug#824792: new upstream release: 0.8.0

On Thu, 19 May 2016 22:11:01 +0200 =?utf-8?b?T25kxZllaiBTdXLDvQ==?= wrote: > looks like there's a new upstream version (since Apr 10).  Let me know > if you don't have time, I could prepare NMU (and fix the missing .a in > one go). I'd appreciate it if you could help me out on this as I'm indeed

Bug#775689:

ดาวน์โหลด Outlook for Android

Bug#824908: apt: inconsistent “header” terminology throughout documentation, comments, messages

Control: tags -1 + patch On 21-May-2016, Ben Finney wrote: > I will prepare a change set to correct the documentation, code > comments, and messages emitted by APT. These changes are in the Git branch at https://notabug.org/bignose/debian_apt/src/wip/issue/824908/terminology-header-fields>. For

Bug#775689: Do NOT use unetbootin for Debian CD images

On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 18:06:18 + Steve McIntyre wrote: > Source: unetbootin > Severity: serious > Tags: d-i > Justification: wasting massive amounts of developer and user time > > I've already added one wishlist bug for d-i to add code to detect > unetbootin usage and complain about it

<    1   2   3