Jack,
can you please confirm that removing the scim-anthy package resolves the
problem for you as well? Once we have a solid understanding of the root
cause of the problem instead of the bashing and frantic, baseless
hand-waving that some people prefer we can think about what will be the
bes
Version: 1.0.5
Control: forcemerge -1 712191
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 23:44 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> As discussed previously, support for i386/amd basd devices (I have the QNAP
> TS-569 Pro)
> would be nice.
Why are you filing this as a new bug? You can follow up to an existing
bug by writing to n
Hello,
On 15/06/2013 00:29, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Source: llvm-toolchain-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> Builds of llvm-toolchain-3.3 have failed for several architectures
> because lldb doesn't compile there; you can find the logs at
>
Quoting Thomas Goirand (z...@debian.org):
> I think that someone who doesn't know what a tenant is in OpenStack
> should either give-up using it or read some more documentation. So I'd
> be fine with simply removing "(project)".
Still...:-)
I'm thinking about translators who need information in
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
standard install
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
$ lshw
-mult
On 06/15/2013 05:25 AM, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> In OpenStack, a tenant is a synonym of a project. I don't think it was a
>> rename, I saw both. For example, the OpenStack dashboard (Horizon) shows
>> "projects" and not "tenants" in the admin interface:
>> http://www.openstack
On Friday, 14 June, 2013 03:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 14/06/13 09:22, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
ISTR recommending a package not in the archive was a bug, but I can't find a
reference. So if you would like to keep this that's fine with me as it won't
prevent migration of your pa
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "amanda"
* Package name: amanda
Version : 1:3.3.3-3
Upstream Author : Amanda Development Team
* URL : http://www.amanda.org
* License : GPL and Unive
On 2013-06-14 Charlie Hagedorn wrote:
> mesa-utils was not installed. After installing it (didn't pull in any other
> packages), I get:
> [:~]$ glxgears -info
> Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
> Error: couldn't get an RGB, Double-buffered visual
> [:~]$
And at this point it sim
Dear Debian maintainer,
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013, I notified you of the beginning of a review process
concerning debconf templates for cinder.
The debian-l10n-english contributors have now reviewed these templates,
and the final proposed changes are attached to this update to the
original bug rep
Package: texlive-latex-base
Version: 2013.20130530-1
Severity: serious
babel.sty in /var/lib/texmf/tex/generic/babel/babel.sty was created
by thailatex and must be removed ...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Source: libgit2
Version: 0.18.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
This package requires internet connectivity for its test suite
to pass. Package builds must not not rely on external network
connectivity, but should be self-contained.
The test tries to resolve github.c
On Fri, June 14, 2013 16:46, Martin Geisler wrote:
> Package: ca-certificates
> Version: 20130119
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I feel this part of the package description is ackward:
>
> Please note that Debian can neither confirm nor deny whether the
> certificate authorities whose certificates ar
Source: node-oauth
Version: 0.9.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
This package requires internet connectivity for its test suite
to pass. Package builds must not not rely on external network
connectivity, but should be self-contained.
Build log:
[...]
When perform
Hi,
> i think that has been fixed in 4.0~a21-1, can you check?
Unfortunately, we can't easily check since the 4.0 series dropped
support for Squeeze.
Any bugfix commit we could try backporting to 3.0.23 and see if it
fixes things up? Would that be b018878 ("Reading configuration files
before cm
Source: python-django-treebeard
Version: 2.0~beta1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
python-django-treebeard fails to build from source in a minimal
build environment because it is missing a build-dependency on
python-setuptools.
Build log:
dpkg-buildpackage: source p
Package: kicad
Version: 0.20120526+bzr3261-1
Severity: wishlist
Err, not much else to add!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU cores)
[ please do not drop the bts from cc ]
On 06/15/2013 10:22 AM, ta...@boum.org wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> i think that has been fixed in 4.0~a21-1, can you check?
>
> Unfortunately, we can't easily check since the 4.0 series dropped
> support for Squeeze.
>
> Any bugfix commit we could try backportin
Package: glx-diversions
Version: 0.3.0
Severity: serious
In Mesa 9.1 the libGL installation has changed, especially libGL.so.1 no
longer points to libGL.so.1.2 but rather libGL.so.1.2.0:
,
| $ ls -l /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libGL.so*
| lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Jun 7 21:37 /usr/lib/i386-l
Package: ftp.debian.org
Kamal Mostafa writes:
> Package 'eventstat' is stuck and won't migrate to testing, apparently
> due to old kfreebsd binary packages from eventstat (0.01.18-1):
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/eventstat.html
>
> In version 0.01.19-1, the author realized that this packag
Package: libp11-kit0
Version: 0.12-3
Severity: minor
Hello
If I try using mpop (with SSL) to download mail, the terminal is clobbered the
error:
---
p11-kit: couldn't load module: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/gnome-keyring-
pkcs11.so: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so:
Package: dokuwiki
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I installed the dokuwiki package, then removed it.
During installation, I choose not to configure lighttpd, but
lighttpd was installed on my system.
The postrm did a:
lighty-disable-mod dokuwiki
This cammand failed with the following error
Hi,
On 15/06/13 09:30, f...@rolf.leggewie.biz wrote:
> On Friday, 14 June, 2013 03:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 14/06/13 09:22, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> ISTR recommending a package not in the archive was a bug, but I can't find a
>>> reference. So if you would like to keep t
I am starting to get the feeling that tickets 708269 and 705524 have a
similar root cause, namely multi-arch incompatibilities between
different binary packages in the scim eco system.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Hi,
On 15/06/13 06:16, Eduardo Ono wrote:
> Package: glines
>
> Version: 3.4.2-3
>
> ii glines 1:3.4.2-3
> i386 make color lines of five or more length
Please next time use reportbug, it will tell us that and more information that
we need.
> In menu g
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:04:24PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > Iain,
> >
> > thanks for the patch, however db5.3 will be obsoleted by db6.0 (in NEW),
> so this won't be fixed.
> >
> > Would it be possible for you to check if db6.0 is affected?
On 15/06/13 03:11, Takashi Yano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for checking the backtrace log.
>
>>> (gnome-control-center:5976): Clutter-CRITICAL **: Unable to initialize
>>> Clutter: Unable to find suitable fbconfig for the GLX
> context: Failed to find any compatible fbconfigs
>>> [New Thread 0xacf8
Package: libkrb5-3
Version: 1.10.1+dfsg-6
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
update of libkrb5-3 from 1.10.1+dfsg-5 to 1.10.1+dfsg-6 in Sid AMD64 broke
multiarch feature all krb5 libs in :i386 are
suppressed(libkrkrb5-3:i386,libkrb5support0:i386,libgssapi-
krb5-2:i386,libk5crypto3:i386) so other
Hi,
On 15/06/13 04:01, Stephan Schreiber wrote:
> I'm using Debian unstable on ia64.
>
> I built the gtk+3.0 package twice; the test always fails as on the ia64
> buildd:
>
> /usr/bin/make check-local
> make[4]: Entering directory
> `/home/stephan/gtkplus2/gtk+3.0-3.8.2/debian/build/shared/tes
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
another package of an old version that can be dropped now:
$ dak rm -nR haskell-quickcheck1
Working... done.
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
haskell-quickcheck1 | 1.2.0.1-6 | source
li
Hi emacs-w3m developers,
Could you please reconsider setting w3m-use-cookies to t by default
for the next release?
On April 17, 2007, [emacs-w3m:09385], jasonspiro4 (at gmail.com) wrote:
> 2007/4/17, Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:
>> > Why don't you enable the option by default?
>>
>> It might be becaus
Hi Lorenzo,
I'm Cc'ing the bug-report again as I think this discussion should be
public.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 11:34:42AM +0200, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> > There is such a mechanism. See the update-alternatives(8) man page.
>
> I'm aware of the update-alternatives.
> What I'm saying is that it
Package: galternatives
Version: 0.13.5+nmu2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I installed galternatives with apt-get install. When I run it from gnome-
terminal, I get this python traceback:
$ galternatives
No protocol specified
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py:57: Gtk
Control: fixed -1 7.1
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 17:21 +0700, Aleksey Kravchenko wrote:
> Fixed in the RHash version 1.2.9-8+deb7u1 :)
The bug in rhash, yes. Not the release.d.o bug.
For future reference, the release.d.o bug should stay open until the
point release has happened, at which point we clo
Package: nss-pam-ldapd
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch
Please include the attached Danish nss-pam-ldapd translations.
joe@pc:~/over/debian/nss-pam-ldapd$ msgfmt --statistics -c -v -o /dev/null da.po
da.po: 51 oversatte tekster.
bye
Joe
da.po.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Greetings! I am having a look for guy!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: evince
Version: 3.4.0-3.1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
When I use evince I can print one page per side.
If I choose 2 pages per side it prints 4.
I have a canon printer whose drivers could be the problem, however libreoffice
works... so I think its not there
-- System Informatio
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Recent updates to various Haskell packages have made them unbuildable on
the architectures that lack GHCi (interpreter) support. I already filed
a request for armel and armhf in #712036, which were unusual because
they had GHCi disabled recently; this bug
* Guillem Jover , 2013-06-15, 05:19:
The X-POFile-SpellExtra field, generated and parsed by POFileSpell
(from gettext-lint), currently needs to be present multiple times,
one per line. Merging all those fields into a single one, spanning
multiple lines makes POFileSpell unable to recognize it.
Source: gnat-gps
Version: 5.0-13
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: binutils-h8300-hms
Version: 2.16.1-8
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Enteri
Source: xemacs21-packages
Version: 2009.02.17.dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> cd .
Source: yafc
Version: 1.2.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering directory `/
Source: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
Version: 1:1.0.1-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1
Source: binutils-z80
Version: 2.22-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[5]: Entering direc
Source: yap
Version: 5.1.3-6
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/«
Source: elib
Version: 1.0-11.1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
> dh_test
Source: oneliner-el
Version: 0.3.6-7.1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering dir
Source: emms
Version: 3.0+20110425+1.git298e022-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: E
Source: r5rs-doc
Version: 20010328-7
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> #f
> makeinfo r5rs.txi
Source: tamuanova
Version: 0.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory
Source: gri
Version: 2.12.23-2.2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory
Source: biomaj
Version: 1.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: aalib
Version: 1.4p5-40
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory
Source: freepops
Version: 0.2.9-7
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> Overfull \hbox (36.65346p
Source: epix
Version: 1.2.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory `
Source: slime
Version: 1:20120525-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: eukleides
Version: 1.5.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directo
Source: arbtt
Version: 0.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
> test -x
Source: stumpwm
Version: 1:20110819.gitca08e08-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> 0 errors, 0
Source: octave-fixed
Version: 0.7.10-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
>
Source: bnd
Version: 1.50.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
> test -x
Source: kbuild
Version: 1:0.1.9998svn2577+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[5]: En
Source: monotone
Version: 1.0-8
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering directory
Source: gnugo
Version: 3.8-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Entering directory `/«
Source: ht
Version: 2.0.20-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering directory `/«
Source: binutils-m68hc1x
Version: 1:2.18-3.2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[5]: Enteri
Source: remake
Version: 3.82+dbg0.9+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering
Source: binutils-avr
Version: 2.20.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[5]: Entering dir
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Version: 2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[5]: Entering dire
Source: cdk
Version: 1:1.2.10-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
> test -
Source: cfi
Version: 3.0-9
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need the depend on texlive-lang-swedish
Package: gdk-pixbuf
Followup-For: Bug #709915
Dear Maintainer,
Thanks for forwarding this bug, but it seems that developers are ignoring
this. Please, could you apply this patch in debian build.
https://bug686514.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=244569 .
There are some similar r
Source: auto-multiple-choice
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need the depend on te
Source: speechd-el
Version: 2.5-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
> dh_t
Source: cln
Version: 1.3.2-1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory `
Source: cairo-dock
Version: 3.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: sml-mode
Version: 4.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: binutils-msp430
Version: 2.22~msp20120406-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[5]:
Source: tetex-brev
Version: 4.22.6+nmu1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering di
Source: acl2
Version: 6.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
>| start address -T 0xc5bbfb0
Source: doc-debian-es
Version: 2.6
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directo
Source: xemacs21
Version: 21.4.22-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering direct
Source: biojava3-live
Version: 3.0.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering dir
Source: packaging-tutorial
Version: 0.8
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need the depend on texlive-
Source: vm
Version: 8.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory `/«P
Source: bashdb
Version: 4.2.0.8-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering direct
Source: octave-communications
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Ente
Source: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.42.5-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering dire
Source: xen
Version: 4.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory `/«
Source: felix-latin
Version: 2.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need the depend on texlive-lang-
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:24:07AM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> The problem is that MP_CMD_SRV_DECLARE2(authz_provider) and
> MP_CMD_SRV_DECLARE2(authn_provider) register the cleanup against
> parms->server->process->pool which lives longer than the pconf pool
> and therefore the load time o
Package: apparmor
Version: 2.7.103-4
Severity: wishlist
Please package AppArmor 2.8 in Debian.
This bug report is here so that we can mark other bugs are blocked by
this one, track progress, and report initial tests.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrig
Control: retitle -1 aa-status does not show loaded profiles
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Control: block -1 by 712370
Hi,
(Hopefully the reporter's email does not bounce this time.)
> I will try to answer your questions. First, rules are working and AppArmor is
> blocki
> What's the output of `ls -l /dev/rfkill' ?
crw-r--r-T+ 1 root root 10, 59 Jun 8 21:18 /dev/rfkill
> What version of udev and kernel do you have?
udev version is:
ii udev 175-7.2 i386
/dev/ and hotplug management daemon
Kernel Ver
Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I'm thinking about translators who need information in order to choose
> the right thing to do.
>
> I propose the following:
>
>
> Template: keystone/create-admin-tenant
> Type: boolean
> Default: false
> # Translators: a "tenant" in OpenStack world is
> # an entity th
Justin B Rye wrote:
> (By "keep it aside" do you mean "keep it set off by commas"?)
I mean "set off by parentheses", obviously. Or just "parenthesized".
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
--
intrigeri wrote (15 Jun 2013 11:02:26 GMT) :
> (Hopefully the reporter's email does not bounce this time.)
It still does:
: host mx.lavabit.com[72.249.41.52] said: 550 This
account has been locked as a result of inactivity. (in reply to RCPT TO
command)
falconbird, please do consid
On 2013-06-15 Vaibhav Niku wrote:
> Package: libp11-kit0
> Version: 0.12-3
> Severity: minor
> Hello
> If I try using mpop (with SSL) to download mail, the terminal is clobbered the
> error:
> ---
> p11-kit: couldn't load module: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/gnome-keyring-
> pkcs11.so: /usr
1 - 100 of 315 matches
Mail list logo
