Package: linux-headers-2.6.14-1-686
Version: 2.6.14-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
many links in the headers' tree are not created by the package; every package
installation gives unpredictable results, sometimes a link was made, sometimes
not.
Furthermore an include/
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 03:25:01PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> I haven't had success trying to reproduce this bug with vanilla
> fetchmail 6.2.5, but I see where it might come from: the IMAP client
> ignores EXPUNGE responses, and this is bound to fail if the client reuses
> a previously receiv
merge 335981 336371
thanks
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: scm
> Version: 5e1-2
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
It is not necessary to file duplicate bug reports. Please check the
BTS before filing reports.
Thomas
--
T
Package: dnsmasq
Version: 2.23-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Found some typos in '/usr/share/man/man8/dnsmasq.8.gz', see attached '.diff'.
Hope this helps...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Archi
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 12:41:55PM +0300, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the bug title says almost everything. include/asm-${ARCH} headers
> are missing from linux-headers-2.6.14-1 as of revision -1 (tested
> on i836 and amd64). This makes linux-headers almost unusable for
> building external m
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 05:36:23AM +0100, Mau wrote:
> Package: linux-headers-2.6.14-1-686
> Version: 2.6.14-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> many links in the headers' tree are not created by the package; every package
> installation gives unpredictable result
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Trying to upgrade e2fsprogs from version 1.35-6 to version 1.38-2 failed with a
'Pre-Depends / Conflicts' error and a suggestion that enabling
APT::Force-LoopBreak might work. According to man apt.conf(5):
Force-
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Trying to upgrade e2fsprogs from version 1.35-6 to version 1.38-2 failed with a
'Pre-Depends / Conflicts' error and a suggestion that enabling
APT::Force-LoopBreak might work. According to man apt.conf(5):
Force-
Symbol: CEOA . pk
Recent Price: $1.08
Expected Trading Range: $3.50 - $5.00 (post split)
Shares Outstanding: 35M (est.)
Float (est.): 5M
This st0ck has just started a Major PR Campaign!!
How will it react to th0usands of investors
in the know now?
Could this be some fast cash?
We are e
Symbol: CEOA . pk
Recent Price: $1.08
Expected Trading Range: $3.50 - $5.00 (post split)
Shares Outstanding: 35M (est.)
Float (est.): 5M
This st0ck has just started a Major PR Campaign!!
How will it react to th0usands of investors
in the know now?
Could this be some fast cash?
We are e
Symbol: CEOA . pk
Recent Price: $1.08
Expected Trading Range: $3.50 - $5.00 (post split)
Shares Outstanding: 35M (est.)
Float (est.): 5M
This st0ck has just started a Major PR Campaign!!
How will it react to th0usands of investors
in the know now?
Could this be some fast cash?
We are e
Symbol: CEOA . pk
Recent Price: $1.08
Expected Trading Range: $3.50 - $5.00 (post split)
Shares Outstanding: 35M (est.)
Float (est.): 5M
This st0ck has just started a Major PR Campaign!!
How will it react to th0usands of investors
in the know now?
Could this be some fast cash?
We are e
Symbol: CEOA . pk
Recent Price: $1.08
Expected Trading Range: $3.50 - $5.00 (post split)
Shares Outstanding: 35M (est.)
Float (est.): 5M
This st0ck has just started a Major PR Campaign!!
How will it react to th0usands of investors
in the know now?
Could this be some fast cash?
We are e
Symbol: CEOA . pk
Recent Price: $1.08
Expected Trading Range: $3.50 - $5.00 (post split)
Shares Outstanding: 35M (est.)
Float (est.): 5M
This st0ck has just started a Major PR Campaign!!
How will it react to th0usands of investors
in the know now?
Could this be some fast cash?
We are e
Symbol: CEOA . pk
Recent Price: $1.08
Expected Trading Range: $3.50 - $5.00 (post split)
Shares Outstanding: 35M (est.)
Float (est.): 5M
This st0ck has just started a Major PR Campaign!!
How will it react to th0usands of investors
in the know now?
Could this be some fast cash?
We are e
Symbol: CEOA . pk
Recent Price: $1.08
Expected Trading Range: $3.50 - $5.00 (post split)
Shares Outstanding: 35M (est.)
Float (est.): 5M
This st0ck has just started a Major PR Campaign!!
How will it react to th0usands of investors
in the know now?
Could this be some fast cash?
We are e
Symbol: CEOA . pk
Recent Price: $1.08
Expected Trading Range: $3.50 - $5.00 (post split)
Shares Outstanding: 35M (est.)
Float (est.): 5M
This st0ck has just started a Major PR Campaign!!
How will it react to th0usands of investors
in the know now?
Could this be some fast cash?
We are e
Symbol: CEOA . pk
Recent Price: $1.08
Expected Trading Range: $3.50 - $5.00 (post split)
Shares Outstanding: 35M (est.)
Float (est.): 5M
This st0ck has just started a Major PR Campaign!!
How will it react to th0usands of investors
in the know now?
Could this be some fast cash?
We are e
Symbol: CEOA . pk
Recent Price: $1.08
Expected Trading Range: $3.50 - $5.00 (post split)
Shares Outstanding: 35M (est.)
Float (est.): 5M
This st0ck has just started a Major PR Campaign!!
How will it react to th0usands of investors
in the know now?
Could this be some fast cash?
We are e
Symbol: CEOA . pk
Recent Price: $1.08
Expected Trading Range: $3.50 - $5.00 (post split)
Shares Outstanding: 35M (est.)
Float (est.): 5M
This st0ck has just started a Major PR Campaign!!
How will it react to th0usands of investors
in the know now?
Could this be some fast cash?
We are e
Symbol: CEOA . pk
Recent Price: $1.08
Expected Trading Range: $3.50 - $5.00 (post split)
Shares Outstanding: 35M (est.)
Float (est.): 5M
This st0ck has just started a Major PR Campaign!!
How will it react to th0usands of investors
in the know now?
Could this be some fast cash?
We are e
Symbol: CEOA . pk
Recent Price: $1.08
Expected Trading Range: $3.50 - $5.00 (post split)
Shares Outstanding: 35M (est.)
Float (est.): 5M
This st0ck has just started a Major PR Campaign!!
How will it react to th0usands of investors
in the know now?
Could this be some fast cash?
We are e
Thanks for the bug report. I just did an upload which I hope will fix
it. Please re-open the bug if not :) Look for the -4 version.
peace,
isaac
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: haskell-cabal
Severity: normal
From: Frederik Eaton
Subject: cabal installation
It would be nice if cabal would unlink destination files before
installing over them, rather than just calling "copyFile". It appears
that when "copyFile" finds that a destination file already exists,
rather
Package: kernel-package
Version: 9.008.4
Severity: normal
When installing a newly built kernel, I received the following error
message:
# dpkg -i linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7_workstation.1_i386.deb
Selecting previously deselected package linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7.
(Reading database ... 173674 files and
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 12:16:10AM -0400, Daniel Martin said
> Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > this bug has been open for a while now; do you think you'll have time to
> > upload the fix anytime soon? Would you liks someone to NMU it for you?
>
> I've been sucked in
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 08:37:55AM +0900, Taketoshi Sano said
> Hi.
>
> on "Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:05:18 +1000",
> Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This bug has been sitting around in the BTS for a while now, and is now
> > RC; do you think you'll have time to make a new upload soon?
>
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 07:20:01AM +0200, Hanno 'Rince' Wagner said
> Hi,
>
> Rob Weir schrieb am 29. October 2005:
>
> > Do you you think you'll have time to upload this fix soon, or would you
> > prefer to have someone NMU it?
>
> Please do an NMU (especially since I thought I orphaned that pa
LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I delete psvn.elc and then everything seems right.
> How about delete this file in preinst or postrm?
I don't decide how Subversion is packaged for Debian.
I only hack psvn.el in the upstream repository.
In my opinion, the best course of action would be t
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In pcvs.el, x11-ssh-askpass is used.
Not in Emacs 21.4, nor in emacs--multi-tty--0--patch-426.
In pcvs-parse.el, cvs-parse-ignored-messages holds a regexp
with which pcvs skips messages where ssh reports it is starting
ssh-askpass. But pcvs itself never
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pcmanx-pure-gtk2
Version : 0.3.3
Upstream Author : Hong Jen Yee, http://pcman.ptt.cc/
* URL or Web page : http://pcmanx.csie.net/
* License : GPL
Description : user-friendly telnet client mainly targets BBS users
PCMa
301 - 331 of 331 matches
Mail list logo
