Adrian Bunk writes:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 08:22:04PM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
>> Adrian Bunk writes:
>>
>> > On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 09:43:36PM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> Thank you for the bug report and patch. I did a slight adjustment
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 08:22:04PM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 09:43:36PM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Thank you for the bug report and patch. I did a slight adjustment,
> >> adding the parameters in
Adrian Bunk writes:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 09:43:36PM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thank you for the bug report and patch. I did a slight adjustment,
>> adding the parameters in debian/rules, and targeting the "gnu" libc,
>> see
>> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/g
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 09:43:36PM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for the bug report and patch. I did a slight adjustment, adding the
> parameters in debian/rules, and targeting the "gnu" libc, see
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/grok/-/commit/fe4c4b549ae25950072
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 12:46:40AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Source: grok
> Version: 1.20110708.1-4.5
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
>
> The glibc SunRPC implementation has been marked obsolete for so
Source: grok
Version: 1.20110708.1-4.5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
The glibc SunRPC implementation has been marked obsolete for some time.
It has been removed upstream from glibc 2.32, and it got disabled in th
6 matches
Mail list logo
