Bug#984582: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#984582: apparmor FTCBFS: many different reasons

Control: tag -1 - patch Control: tag -1 - moreinfo Control: tag -1 + help Hi, Helmut Grohne (2021-03-20): >> > 4. Then it uses AC_CHECK_FILE to locate a header. Bad idea. >> >AC_CHECK_FILE is for host files, not for build files. Please use >> > test -e instead. > > https://gitlab.com/apparmor

Bug#984582: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#984582: apparmor FTCBFS: many different reasons

Hi Helmut, First: wow, great investigative work! Helmut Grohne (2021-03-05): > So I have a longer patch fixing 1-6 attached. Please consider applying > it. I guess this is post-bullseye material though. Of course you can > give some feedback pre-bullseye to move this forward. I would be happy to

Bug#984582: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#984582: apparmor FTCBFS: many different reasons

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 06:41:35PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > Hello, > > Am Freitag, 5. März 2021, 13:07:45 CET schrieb Helmut Grohne: > > 4. Then it uses AC_CHECK_FILE to locate a header. Bad idea. > >AC_CHECK_FILE is for host files, not for build files. Please use > > test -e instead.

Bug#984582: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#984582: apparmor FTCBFS: many different reasons

Hello, Am Freitag, 5. März 2021, 13:07:45 CET schrieb Helmut Grohne: > 4. Then it uses AC_CHECK_FILE to locate a header. Bad idea. >AC_CHECK_FILE is for host files, not for build files. Please use > test -e instead. > 6. The configure script assumes that $PYTHON-config is right. >Unfortun