On 2021-03-08 18:54:22 [+0100], Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> Please upload to unstable. As said, we'll let it age a bit there.
Thanks, uploaded.
> Paul
Sebastian
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi,
On 04-03-2021 12:32, Paul Gevers wrote:
> What I *think* we're going to do is accept the package in unstable, but
> have it age a bit in unstable before unblocking (which is going to
> happen automatically due to the hard freeze).
Please upload to unstable. As said
On 2021-03-04 12:32:48 [+0100], Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Sebastian
Hi,
> Can you please send a debdiff where you undo the renaming (where
> applicable), such that we get a better understanding of the real changes?
Sure. Please find attached.
> What I *think* we're going to do is accept the packag
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Sebastian
On 02-03-2021 21:55, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> Unfortunately we haven't made up our mind yet, but to get some (albeit
>> limited) exposure and autopkgtest coverage (via the pseudo-excuses) [2],
>> I think your chances for a go are higher if the pro
On 2021-03-02 19:44:58 [+0100], Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Paul,
> Unfortunately we haven't made up our mind yet, but to get some (albeit
> limited) exposure and autopkgtest coverage (via the pseudo-excuses) [2],
> I think your chances for a go are higher if the proposed package is
> av
Hi Sebastian,
On 18-02-2021 23:57, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Please unblock package xz-utils.
xz-utils is listed on our (build-)essential list [1]. Because the
package is potentially influencing the build artifacts, we're reluctant
to allow changes at this moment because corner case use
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package xz-utils.
I NMUed xz-utils to 5.2.5-1.0 fixing a few bugs including #844770 and
#975981. Both bugs were fixed by upstream differently / more complete.
I prepared an N
7 matches
Mail list logo
