Bug#982671: Supporting unbound in stretch by upgrading to 1.9

2021-02-22 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: tags -1 wontfix Hello, thanks for the report. There is no plan to continue support for the Python bindings of unbound in Stretch. The official support ended last year. See also DSA-4694-1. [1] We have resumed support a few weeks ago but only for the unbound server itself, as well as unb

Bug#982671: Supporting unbound in stretch by upgrading to 1.9

2021-02-18 Thread Markus Koschany
Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2021, 11:40 +0200 schrieb Andrei POPESCU: [...] > Hello, > > This appears to be the case. A side effect of this is that unless dealt > with manually these bugs will just linger in the BTS. > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint= > > Please either close

Bug#982671: Supporting unbound in stretch by upgrading to 1.9

2021-02-18 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 17 feb 21, 22:47:32, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 17.02.2021, 15:21 -0500 schrieb Robert Edmonds: > > Markus Koschany wrote: > [...] > > > Please feel free to reassign and/or adjust the bug report as necessary. > > > > I get the following error message from the BTS. Do I need t

Bug#982671: Supporting unbound in stretch by upgrading to 1.9

2021-02-17 Thread Markus Koschany
Am Mittwoch, den 17.02.2021, 15:21 -0500 schrieb Robert Edmonds: > Markus Koschany wrote: [...] > > Please feel free to reassign and/or adjust the bug report as necessary. > > I get the following error message from the BTS. Do I need to do > "reassign 982671 unbound1.9" instead? I also got some e

Bug#982671: Supporting unbound in stretch by upgrading to 1.9

2021-02-17 Thread Robert Edmonds
Markus Koschany wrote: > Hello, > > Am Mittwoch, den 17.02.2021, 14:09 -0500 schrieb Robert Edmonds: > > Hi, > > > > #982671 / #982672 is incorrectly reported against the python-unbound > > package. It should instead be against the unbound binary package because > > this functionality is in the u

Bug#982671: Supporting unbound in stretch by upgrading to 1.9

2021-02-17 Thread Markus Koschany
Hello, Am Mittwoch, den 17.02.2021, 14:09 -0500 schrieb Robert Edmonds: > Hi, > > #982671 / #982672 is incorrectly reported against the python-unbound > package. It should instead be against the unbound binary package because > this functionality is in the unbound daemon. Please feel free to rea

Bug#982671: Supporting unbound in stretch by upgrading to 1.9

2021-02-17 Thread Robert Edmonds
Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi, > > Am Mittwoch, den 17.02.2021, 12:43 -0500 schrieb Robert Edmonds: > [...] > > Hi, > > > > It looks like #982671 / #982672 was assigned by the BTS to src:unbound > > rather than src:unbound1.9. I attempted to re-assign the bug to > > src:unbound1.9 with notfound/fou

Bug#982671: Supporting unbound in stretch by upgrading to 1.9

2021-02-17 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 17.02.2021, 12:43 -0500 schrieb Robert Edmonds: [...] > Hi, > > It looks like #982671 / #982672 was assigned by the BTS to src:unbound > rather than src:unbound1.9. I attempted to re-assign the bug to > src:unbound1.9 with notfound/found but I don't think that worked since I