Control: reassign -1 xcwcp
Control: retitle -1 xcwcp: should dlopen SO-versioned libpulse-simple
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 4:30 PM Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: To Federico Grau
> > const char *library_name = "libpulse-simple.so";
> > if (!cw_dlopen_internal(library_name, &(cw_pa.hand
Re: To Federico Grau
> const char *library_name = "libpulse-simple.so";
> if (!cw_dlopen_internal(library_name, &(cw_pa.handle))) {
>
> Federico: do you want to do that change? (Please check if the fix is
> only for xcwcp or also for the other binaries in the unixcw source.)
Or pe
Re: Andreas Metzler
> that change is in direct opposition to to Debian's way of handling
> shared libraries. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html
>
> If xcwcp requires the unversioned .so it will need a dependency on the
> development package.
xcwcp opens libpulse-simple.so
On 2021-01-02 Federico Grau wrote:
> Package: libpulse-dev
> Version: 12.2-4+deb10u1
> Severity: normal
> Dear Maintainer,
> * What led up to the situation?
> Other programs were failing, because they were unable to load
> libpulse-simple.so library file with only libpulse0 package insta
Package: libpulse-dev
Version: 12.2-4+deb10u1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Other programs were failing, because they were unable to load
libpulse-simple.so library file with only libpulse0 package installed.
The xcwcp package is one such example.
5 matches
Mail list logo
