Bug#966525: dmagnetic FTBFS on i386: check-sixel failed

2020-08-02 Thread dettus
Hello everybody. After Adrian was kind enough to give me a solution to my problem, I was able to apply it. So my wonderful project dMagnetic can now be found with the release number 0.25-2 in your mentors.debian.net system. https://mentors.debian.net/package/dmagnetic/ Now, I would kindly

Bug#966525: dmagnetic FTBFS on i386: check-sixel failed

2020-08-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 06:02:03PM +0200, Thomas Dettbarn wrote: > Hello Adrian. > > So, I patched my package, and uploaded to mentors. > > I got a message with the subject "dmagnetic_0.25-1: > ACCEPTED into unstable." > > It can be found here, > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/dmagnetic/

Bug#966525: dmagnetic FTBFS on i386: check-sixel failed

2020-07-31 Thread Thomas Dettbarn
Hello Adrian. So, I patched my package, and uploaded to mentors. I got a message with the subject "dmagnetic_0.25-1: ACCEPTED into unstable." It can be found here, https://mentors.debian.net/package/dmagnetic/ but now I am a little bit concerned about the developer information page: https://

Bug#966525: dmagnetic FTBFS on i386: check-sixel failed

2020-07-30 Thread Thomas Dettbarn
https://mentors.debian.net/package/dmagnetic/   Okay. I applied your patch. Please have a look. Adrian Bunk hat am 30.07.2020 16:29 geschrieben:     On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 03:47:49PM +0200, Tho

Bug#966525: dmagnetic FTBFS on i386: check-sixel failed

2020-07-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 03:47:49PM +0200, Thomas Dettbarn wrote: >... > One last thing... Why did your patch say "ifneq... i386"? ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), i386)) ^ This compares the empty string with the filter result. ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH), i386) would to the same in this case.

Bug#966525: dmagnetic FTBFS on i386: check-sixel failed

2020-07-30 Thread Thomas Dettbarn
Man, I hate floats... I try to avoid them as much as I can, because I am dreading the butterfly effect. And, this time around I was lazy, and one of the butterflies kicked me. Funny thing about the m68k: My project ACTUALLY has an m68k virtual machine inside. ;) Okay, so: This release (0.25)

Bug#966525: dmagnetic FTBFS on i386: check-sixel failed

2020-07-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 02:46:55PM +0200, Thomas Dettbarn wrote: > Hello Adrian! Hi Thomas! >... > Apparently, it only happens on > i386, but I fear that it might occur on other architectures as > well. For being able to run on old hardware, only the old x87 FPU is used on the Debian i386 port.

Bug#966525: dmagnetic FTBFS on i386: check-sixel failed

2020-07-30 Thread Thomas Dettbarn
Hello Adrian! Hmm... I wonder what is going on there? May I bother you to send me the output of echo "Dreye"| ./dMagnetic -ini dMagnetic.ini \ -vmode "sixel" -vcols 300 -vrows 300 -vecho \ -sres 1024x768 -mag testcode/minitest.mag >fails.txt running on an i386 computer with Debia

Bug#966525: dmagnetic FTBFS on i386: check-sixel failed

2020-07-30 Thread Thomas Dettbarn
Edit: Okay, now I see the problem: It is the only place in the code where I used floats. Hmmm. Bummer... You said that your patch helps with that? Then I will add it to the debian package. For future releases, I will get rid of the floating point code. It is ugly anyways. Thomas > Thomas De

Bug#966525: dmagnetic FTBFS on i386: check-sixel failed

2020-07-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: dmagnetic Version: 0.25-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs patch https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=dmagnetic&arch=i386&ver=0.25-1&stamp=1595804868&raw=0 ... Initializing the 68K version 0 VM check-high_ansi OK *** dMagnetic 0.25 *** Use at your own risk *** (C)opyright 2020 by d