Hi,
On 7/21/20 10:09 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>> I'm sorry for sending you a poor and untested patch, if you're not generally
>> opposed to this sort of change I will create a proper patch and test it
>> before sending it.
>
> No, I am not generally opposed to the change, I am just generally oppo
Hi,
> so, I’ve seen this before with a different package (bind9) and I’ve seen
> this to gloriously fail because the systemd file was overzealous and
> obviously even you didn’t test it before you sent it to me.
I'm sorry, I hit send prematurely, and it was meant as a sort of RFC.
I've been using
I'm sorry, I was under the illusion that environment variables could be used
for User= and Group=, so these lines should be:
User=bird
Group=bird
--
bauen1
https://dn42.bauen1.xyz/
Package: bird2
Version: 2.0.7-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: j24...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
It would be nice if systemds service file could use the appropriate options
instead of relying on an additional shell script (at least when systemd is
used).
This also allows to enable
> I'm sorry for sending you a poor and untested patch, if you're not
generally opposed to this sort of change I will create a proper patch and
test it before sending it.
No, I am not generally opposed to the change, I am just generally opposed
to "throw in everything and let's see what breaks" in
Hi,
so, I’ve seen this before with a different package (bind9) and I’ve seen
this to gloriously fail because the systemd file was overzealous and
obviously even you didn’t test it before you sent it to me.
Unless the changed systemd file is extensively tested with ALL routing
protocols, there’s n
6 matches
Mail list logo
