On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 03:36:02PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:08:27AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:22:18AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
Hi,
> Alternatively, perhaps replacing the mount.exfat link with something like
> the following would be a better option, to transparently support kernels
> with and without the native module:
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> if grep -qF exfat /pr
severity 963752 normal
thanks
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:08:27AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> Now that exfat is available as a kernel module, it would be nice if the
> /sbin/mount.exfat link were removed to make it easier for a user to choose
> either the exfat kernel module or the fuse module a
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:08:27AM -0400, I wrote:
Now that exfat is available as a kernel module, it would be nice if the
/sbin/mount.exfat link were removed to make it easier for a user to choose
either the exfat kernel module or the fuse module at runtime. Currently the
link masks the kernel m
Package: exfat-fuse
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Now that exfat is available as a kernel module, it would be nice if the
/sbin/mount.exfat link were removed to make it easier for a user to choose
either the exfat kernel module or the fuse module at runtime. Currently the
link masks the kern
5 matches
Mail list logo
