Hello,
I have added ITP bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972503
I have made the source package with the DSC file. The changelog points to the
ITP number.
http://johann-elsass.net/debian/lazpaint/lazpaint_6.4.1-1.dsc
Is it all ok?
Regards
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:08:53PM +0200, Johann ELSASS wrote:
> I don't understand. In a previous message you said you tried it and got an
> error with "lazarus-project" dependency. Do you still get this error?
(It a while, but IIRC I didn't build the package. I just reviewed it on source
level
I don't understand. In a previous message you said you tried it and got an
error with "lazarus-project" dependency. Do you still get this error?
About the DSC file, someone else mentioned it. I don't know about this format
but this has been mentioned to me by someone. May be that's something don
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 07:27:19PM +0200, Johann ELSASS wrote:
> Interesting. I will consider using it.
>
> So have you tried with the dependency change?
I'll need a .dsc file for that.
> --
> Johann ELSASS
> circu...@operamail.com
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020, at 4:23 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
Interesting. I will consider using it.
So have you tried with the dependency change?
--
Johann ELSASS
circu...@operamail.com
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020, at 4:23 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> https://pbuilder-team.pages.debian.net/pbuilder/
>
> TL;DR: debuilder builds your package, but in a possibly
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 09:00:21PM +0200, Johann ELSASS wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't know if using pbuilder matters nor what pbuilder is.
https://pbuilder-team.pages.debian.net/pbuilder/
TL;DR: debuilder builds your package, but in a possibly dirty environment
(as it uses your system and everythi
Hello,
I guess I have fixed the problem with the dependency. In fact "lazarus-project"
is a package downloaded on Lazarus site to get latest version, but that's not
the one in the Debian distribution. So I replaced it with "lcl" and it seems to
compile.
I don't know if using pbuilder matters n
I recall another RFS [1] with the same problem (binary-only package
containing binaries produced with Lazarus). Perhaps something from
that thread could help you.
[1]: http://bugs.debian.org/964087
Regards,
Robin
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:23:17AM +0200, Johann ELSASS wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have made a repository with everything in it. For now it is version 6.4.1.
(Robin also replied, please read the bug mentioned there… Though it has no
solution it might help understanding mechanics)
> It is there: ht
Hello,
I have made a repository with everything in it. For now it is version 6.4.1.
It is there: https://github.com/bgrabitmap/lazpaint-upstream
I will update that later to version 7.* when it is stable.
Regards,
--
Johann ELSASS
circu...@operamail.com
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 5:26 PM, To
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:28:34AM +0200, Johann ELSASS wrote:
> Hello Tobias,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I came up with the following.
>
> First install "lazarus-package" as it is required to compile.
>
> Then the source package would consist of the following:
> - in bgrabitmap subdir extrac
Hello Tobias,
Thanks for your reply. I came up with the following.
First install "lazarus-package" as it is required to compile.
Then the source package would consist of the following:
- in bgrabitmap subdir extract
https://github.com/bgrabitmap/bgrabitmap/archive/master.zip
- in bgracontrols s
Control: tags -1 wontfix
Hi Johann,
thanks for your interest to contribute to Debian!
However, it's unfortunatly not that straight forward… See below for info and
resources!
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 08:04:00AM +0200, Johann ELSASS wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lazpaint":
* Package name: lazpaint
Version : 7.1.3
Upstream Author : Johann ELSASS
* URL : https://github.com/bgrabitmap/lazpaint/releases
* License
14 matches
Mail list logo
