On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:24 PM Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Thu 23 Apr 2020 at 01:09PM +03, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > So what is the way forward you suggest?
> > Asking someone (who?) for advice?
> > RC bug also against p11-kit?
> > ...???
>
> Well, didn't the bug submitter suggest an alternative header
Hello,
On Thu 23 Apr 2020 at 01:09PM +03, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 09:30:55PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> On Tue 10 Mar 2020 at 06:32PM +01, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>>
>> > Its CONTRIBUTING.md [3] adds: "Subject to applicable licensing rules,
>> > the repository cont
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 01:09:42PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> So what is the way forward you suggest?
> Asking someone (who?) for advice?
> RC bug also against p11-kit?
> ...???
It might be worth contacting OASIS on this issue, not sure. Maybe they would be
willing to relicense or clarify licens
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 09:30:55PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Tue 10 Mar 2020 at 06:32PM +01, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>
> > Its CONTRIBUTING.md [3] adds: "Subject to applicable licensing rules,
> > the repository content may be re-used freely, including the creation
> > and publicatio
Hello,
On Tue 10 Mar 2020 at 06:32PM +01, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> Its CONTRIBUTING.md [3] adds: "Subject to applicable licensing rules,
> the repository content may be re-used freely, including the creation
> and publication of derivative works."
> In my reading this complies with DFSG.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 1:27 PM Jack Lloyd wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 10:09:32PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > > In short, OASIS Open is a DFSG compliant license or not?
> >
> > Thanks. It looks like the license which does not permit modification
> > applies to the specification, so the sp
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 10:09:32PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > In short, OASIS Open is a DFSG compliant license or not?
>
> Thanks. It looks like the license which does not permit modification
> applies to the specification, so the specification is not DFSG-free.
>
> As for pkcs11.h, I can't
Hello László,
On Mon 02 Mar 2020 at 10:41PM +01, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 7:54 PM Sean Whitton wrote:
>> On Mon 02 Mar 2020 at 06:39PM +01, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:27 AM Alvin Chen wrote:
>> >> https://sources.debian.org/src
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 7:54 PM Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Mon 02 Mar 2020 at 06:39PM +01, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:27 AM Alvin Chen wrote:
> >> https://sources.debian.org/src/botan/2.12.1-2/src/lib/prov/pkcs11/pkcs11.h/
> > It's up to Jack, who develops Botan.
Hello,
On Mon 02 Mar 2020 at 06:39PM +01, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:27 AM Alvin Chen wrote:
>> Since headers provided by OASIS PKCS11 are not-exactly free license
>> (they do not allow modification),
> Do you mention the " However
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:27 AM Alvin Chen wrote:
> Since headers provided by OASIS PKCS11 are not-exactly free license
> (they do not allow modification),
Do you mention the " However, this document itself may not be
modified in any way, including by
removing the cop
Source: botan
Severity: serious
Since headers provided by OASIS PKCS11 are not-exactly free license
(they do not allow modification),
You can use an alternative header like p11-kit which is licensed under
a more liberal license.
https://sources.debian.org/src/botan/2.12.1-2/src/lib/prov/pkcs11/p
12 matches
Mail list logo
