well, this bug was not really fixed, but the package is now removed in s390x,
so not a real issue anymore.
G.
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 18:00:10 + Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
Source: ndpi
Source-Version: 4.2-1
Done: Gianfranco Costamagna
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the lat
retitle 950404 ndpi FTBFS on i386, ppc64 and s390x due to test failures
retitle 980216 RM: ndpi [i386 s390x] -- RoQA; FTBFS
thanks
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 12:17:55 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> Hello, ndpi FTBFS in i386 ppc64el and s390x.
Hi, it looks like ppc64el is ok while ppc64 FTBFS. T
control: severity -1 important
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 12:09:44 + Nicholas Brown wrote:
> Upstream issues that tracks the UT failures reported on i386 and s390x
> https://github.com/ntop/nDPI/issues/1092
I asked to remove problematic architectures, so the severity can be set to
important now
Upstream issues that tracks the UT failures reported on i386 and s390x
https://github.com/ntop/nDPI/issues/1092
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 04:39:44PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
>...
> If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer
> period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be
> fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on
> other packag
Source: ndpi
Version: 3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: ftbfs
Hi Ludovico,
With the upload of 3.0-1 you started a transition, but you didn't finish
it yet as your package fails to build from source on 4 release
architectures. Please investigate.
Paul
https://buildd.debian.org/status/packag
6 matches
Mail list logo
