On Thu, Jun 04 2020 at 11:24 +01, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> It sounds like djview-plugin should just be removed, since it supports
> a now-dead plugin API.
>
> Any objections?
What about consulting this with Leon Bottou?
Janusz
--
,
Janusz S. Bien
emeryt (emeritus)
https://s
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 12:08:51PM +0200, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04 2020 at 13:00 +03, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 11:36:32AM +0200, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
> >> On Wed, 08 Jan 2020 21:13:33 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >> > Package: djview-plugin
> >> > Version: 4.11-2
It sounds like djview-plugin should just be removed, since it supports
a now-dead plugin API.
Any objections?
On Thu, Jun 04 2020 at 13:00 +03, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 11:36:32AM +0200, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
>> On Wed, 08 Jan 2020 21:13:33 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> > Package: djview-plugin
>> > Version: 4.11-2
>> > Severity: serious
>> >
>> > This package provides an NPAPI plugin.
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 11:36:32AM +0200, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jan 2020 21:13:33 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Package: djview-plugin
> > Version: 4.11-2
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > This package provides an NPAPI plugin.
> > All major browsers have dropped support for NPAPI.
>
> L
On Wed, 08 Jan 2020 21:13:33 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: djview-plugin
> Version: 4.11-2
> Severity: serious
>
> This package provides an NPAPI plugin.
> All major browsers have dropped support for NPAPI.
Looks like there are still some for which it is usable, unfortunately
the package d
Package: djview-plugin
Version: 4.11-2
Severity: serious
This package provides an NPAPI plugin.
All major browsers have dropped support for NPAPI.
7 matches
Mail list logo