Bug#943396: FTBFS on armhf: testsuite segfault

2020-10-27 Thread Bernhard Übelacker
Dear Maintainer, a short addition. The backtrace that I received building with CC=gcc-10 seems to be the same as in #972665, therefore they might be related? Kind regards, Bernhard

Bug#943396: FTBFS on armhf: testsuite segfault

2019-10-25 Thread Graham Inggs
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 21:30, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Is this reproducible in buster, too, or limited to sid/bullseye? Reproducible builds [1] says sid and bullseye only. [1] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/armhf/fftw3.html

Bug#943396: FTBFS on armhf: testsuite segfault

2019-10-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:13:43 +0100 Iain Lane wrote: > Package: src:fftw3 > Version: 3.3.8-2 > We found this in an Ubuntu test rebuild, but I just confirmed on > harris.d.o: Is this reproducible in buster, too, or limited to sid/bullseye? Andreas

Bug#943396: FTBFS on armhf: testsuite segfault

2019-10-24 Thread Sebastien Bacher
The bug also has been reported upstream on https://github.com/FFTW/fftw3/issues/182 which includes a valgrind log. Getting a backtrace is a bit tricky since the test hangs under gdb... Cheers,

Bug#943396: FTBFS on armhf: testsuite segfault

2019-10-24 Thread Iain Lane
Package: src:fftw3 Version: 3.3.8-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hiya, We found this in an Ubuntu test rebuild, but I just confirmed on harris.d.o: > perl -w ./check.pl -r --estimate -c=5 -v `pwd`/bench > Executing "/home/laney/fftw3-3.3.8/tests/bench -o estimate --verbose=1 > --verify '//ob