Ansgar writes:
> That would make any init system in Debian a wrapper around starting
> sysvinit script which seems a bit boring and blocking any innovation to
> me. Though I think it might be close to what runit or OpenRC support
> currently means in Debian.
I don't believe this is the approach
Adam Borowski writes:
> This idea being discussed hasn't been announced anywhere. And, it's
> extremely harmful to the support of anything non-systemd, while providing
> very little if any benefit to systemd users as well. It also would cause
> doubling of maintainer effort.
How would provide s
Hello,
On Sun 01 Dec 2019 at 09:33AM -08, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I don't think there's any urgent need to put out a new normative version
> of Policy and we could hold the next release until January. What do you
> think, Sean?
I'd be happy with an informal hold on normative releases, but before
Adam Borowski writes:
> This idea being discussed hasn't been announced anywhere.
I tried to draw attention to it in debian-devel, for the record, and
everyone there seemed happy with it as well.
> But, in the light of the ongoing GR, arguing would be a waste of time at
> this moment. Thus, co
Hello Adam,
On Sun 01 Dec 2019 at 06:07PM +01, Adam Borowski wrote:
> This idea being discussed hasn't been announced anywhere. And, it's
> extremely harmful to the support of anything non-systemd, while providing
> very little if any benefit to systemd users as well. It also would cause
> doub
Hi!
This idea being discussed hasn't been announced anywhere. And, it's
extremely harmful to the support of anything non-systemd, while providing
very little if any benefit to systemd users as well. It also would cause
doubling of maintainer effort.
But, in the light of the ongoing GR, arguing w
6 matches
Mail list logo
