On 07/10/2019 01:15, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> According to my reading of this britney run, the last 2 blockers were
> removing gnome-shell-extension-easyscreencast and bumping the age for
> eweouz. Both have been done now.
And it has migrated now.
Cheers,
Emilio
According to my reading of this britney run, the last 2 blockers were
removing gnome-shell-extension-easyscreencast and bumping the age for
eweouz. Both have been done now.
Thanks,
Jeremy
Hi,
On 06-10-2019 18:46, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Oct 2019 at 21:00:29 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> If my view of things is
>> up-to-date and correct, it's the last piece of the puzzle together with
>> the samba situation (assuming LO will just build on mips64el).
>
> If I'm reading the
On Wed, 02 Oct 2019 at 21:00:29 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> If my view of things is
> up-to-date and correct, it's the last piece of the puzzle together with
> the samba situation (assuming LO will just build on mips64el).
If I'm reading the log correctly, we have the remaining issues still
blocki
Hi,
On 03-10-2019 09:39, intrigeri wrote:
> FWIW, libgtk2-perl is going away in Bullseye; most of its
> reverse-dependencies were either ported to GTK 3, or not shipped in
> Buster thanks to RC bugs I had filed, or removed from the archive.
> What's left is tracked there:
>
> - https://bugs.debi
Hi,
Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Oct 2019 at 08:48:35 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
>> The odd one out is libgtk2-perl which fails test 44:
> ...
>> GdkPixbuf [ warning ] Inline XPM data is broken: Invalid XPM header
>> not ok 44 - Don't crash on partial pixmap data
> I think this might
On Thu, 03 Oct 2019 at 08:48:35 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:46:50PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > There are also several autopkgtest failures triggered by glib2.0 and
> > gobject-introspection.
>
> I quickly looked over these and it seems they're all except one r
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:46:50PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> There are also several autopkgtest failures triggered by glib2.0 and
> gobject-introspection.
I quickly looked over these and it seems they're all except one related
to compiling stuff with -Werror. Mostly because of using GTime and/o
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:00 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
> If my view of things is
> up-to-date and correct, it's the last piece of the puzzle
There are also several autopkgtest failures triggered by glib2.0 and
gobject-introspection.
Jeremy
Hi,
On 02-10-2019 03:31, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> https://bugs.debian.org/933573 has a patch for eweouz
If somebody could please do an upload that fixes eweouz, that would be
great, than we don't need to resort to removal. If my view of things is
up-to-date and correct, it's the last piece of the pu
Please binNMU glabels for evolution-data-server.
https://bugs.debian.org/933573 has a patch for eweouz
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
On Tue, 01 Oct 2019 at 09:52:29 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> - how to handle folks is being discussed. Suggestion is to update
> zeitgeist (orphaned) and disable zeitgeist integration in folks
> (temporarily or permanently?) in folks. This will unblock folks and
> gnome-contacts.
I've
On 01/10/2019 10:06, r...@rene-engelhard.de wrote:
> Am 1. Oktober 2019 09:52:29 MESZ schrieb Andreas Henriksson
> :
>> Control: block 933548 by 941467
>>
>> Another status update regarding gnome 3.34 transitions.
>>
>> Issues:
>> - DONE: glib2.0 failed on i386 and s390x, but give-backs was used t
Am 1. Oktober 2019 09:52:29 MESZ schrieb Andreas Henriksson :
>Control: block 933548 by 941467
>
>Another status update regarding gnome 3.34 transitions.
>
>Issues:
>- DONE: glib2.0 failed on i386 and s390x, but give-backs was used to
>work
> around it. Needs to be investigated in detail later. Not
Control: block 933548 by 941467
Another status update regarding gnome 3.34 transitions.
Issues:
- DONE: glib2.0 failed on i386 and s390x, but give-backs was used to work
around it. Needs to be investigated in detail later. Not a blocker for
now.
- how to handle folks is being discussed. Sugge
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 01:39:36PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
[...]
> > I'm thus thinking about doing this (unless someone else volunteers):
> > * upload glib2.0 to unstable (to unblock mutter)
> > * upload gnome-desktop3, mutter and gnome-shell
> > * Ask bungie-desktop people to upload t
On 30/09/2019 12:49, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Adding a bunch of CCs for usual suspects as it seems noone got a copy
> of the go-ahead.
>
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 09:42:12PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> [...]
>> Let's get on with this.
>
> Laney pointed
Hello,
Adding a bunch of CCs for usual suspects as it seems noone got a copy
of the go-ahead.
On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 09:42:12PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
[...]
> Let's get on with this.
Laney pointed out that to do gnome-desktop3 standalone we'd
need this patch:
htt
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 01:16:36 +0200 Andreas Henriksson
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> Dear release team,
>
> I've done rebuild tests of reverse dependencies for the gnome-desktop3
> transition and the results are that there's one failure:
> budge-desktop
>
>
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Dear release team,
I've done rebuild tests of reverse dependencies for the gnome-desktop3
transition and the results are that there's one failure:
budge-desktop
(The build logs are temprorarily available from:
https://fatal.se/tmp/gnome-desktop-3_3.34/build-logs/
)
I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
Not for right now, but I'm filing this straight away for information.
gnome-desktop3 has bumped SONAME from 17 to 18 and so we need a
transition. I've upl
21 matches
Mail list logo
