Please start talking to the kernel team now, and let them know your
position.
If you strongly suspect you're going to file an RC bug in the future,
you should be talking now, not just holding back.
I'm available to mediate if that ends up being useful.
control: retitle -1 unblock: zfs-linux/0.7.12-6 (or 0.7.13-1)
control: close -1
Hi Release Team,
On 2019-06-03 15:05, Mo Zhou wrote:
> Patching the kernel is impossible because kernel maintainers
> refused to do that. So that's an invalid solution.
After a short discussion with Aron Xu, I realiz
Hi Paul,
On 2019-05-30 19:51, Paul Gevers wrote:
> or more severe in Debian BTS terms. I may have been wrong, but then
> please point me to the changes so important that you want them in
> buster. Please also be prepared to undo the new upstream release and
> just fix the bugs that are so importan
On 30 mai 2019 21:51, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Mo,
>
> On Thu, 09 May 2019 22:09:18 -0700 Mo Zhou wrote:
>> zfs-linux (= 0.7.13-1) is 66 days in unstable and there is no new bug
>> for it.
>> Compared to (0.7.12-2), the (0.7.13-1) version in unstable only
>> introduc
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Mo,
On Thu, 09 May 2019 22:09:18 -0700 Mo Zhou wrote:
> zfs-linux (= 0.7.13-1) is 66 days in unstable and there is no new bug
> for it.
> Compared to (0.7.12-2), the (0.7.13-1) version in unstable only
> introduces
> bug fixes. Aron has already applied for an unblock
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org
Please unblock package zfs-linux
zfs-linux (= 0.7.13-1) is 66 days in unstable and there is no new bug
for it.
Compared to (0.7.12-2), the (0.7.13-1) version i
6 matches
Mail list logo
