lördag 4 maj 2019 kl. 12:47:18 CEST skrev Magnus Holmgren:
> söndag 21 april 2019 kl. 19:55:10 CEST skrev Magnus Holmgren:
> > But now that I look closer, it looks like the "spool format error" message
> > is only triggered by malformed header files, and Thomas in https://
> > lists.exim.org/lurk
söndag 21 april 2019 kl. 19:55:10 CEST skrev Magnus Holmgren:
> But now that I look closer, it looks like the "spool format error" message
> is only triggered by malformed header files, and Thomas in https://
> lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20180726.174108.0620f3c0.en.html had narrowed
> it down
söndag 21 april 2019 kl. 07:34:15 CEST skrev Andreas Metzler:
> On 2019-04-20 Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > tisdag 16 april 2019 kl. 18:46:56 CEST skrev du:
> [...]
>
> > > I have just uploaded exim 4.92-6 to exoerimental which /should/
> > > work with sa-exim, allowing you to debug properly.
> >
On 2019-04-20 Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> tisdag 16 april 2019 kl. 18:46:56 CEST skrev du:
[...]
> > I have just uploaded exim 4.92-6 to exoerimental which /should/
> > work with sa-exim, allowing you to debug properly.
> Thanks. So far I haven't managed to reproduce the problem of the malformed
>
tisdag 16 april 2019 kl. 18:46:56 CEST skrev du:
> On 2019-04-15 Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > So it seems that everything should work unless spool_wireformat=true
> > *and* SARewriteBody: 1. How do I detect in sa-exim whether wire format
> > is used for a given body file though?
>
> -spool_file_wir
On 2019-04-15 Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> måndag 15 april 2019 kl. 19:46:14 CEST skrev Andreas Metzler:
[l...]
> > I have not tested it but I suspect it might break even more when
> > spool_wireformat is set.
> Isn't it the case that if CHUNKING has been offered AND spool_wireformat is
> set, then
måndag 15 april 2019 kl. 19:46:14 CEST skrev Andreas Metzler:
> Hello,
>
> Afaiu basically exim has got a new feature and in that case (CHUNKING)
> the spoolfile looks a little bit differently and sa-exim fails to handle
> this special case properly.
So it has BDAT lines in it?
> Even in versio
On 2019-04-14 Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> fredag 12 april 2019 kl. 19:23:40 CEST skrev du:
>> The dlopen localscan patch in exim4 has been nonfunctional in unstable
>> for quite some time (4.92~RC2-1/experimental/18 Dec, 4.92~RC3-1
>> unstable/26 Dec and buster/03 Jan). The issue only popped up end o
fredag 12 april 2019 kl. 19:23:40 CEST skrev du:
> The dlopen localscan patch in exim4 has been nonfunctional in unstable
> for quite some time (4.92~RC2-1/experimental/18 Dec, 4.92~RC3-1
> unstable/26 Dec and buster/03 Jan). The issue only popped up end of
> March on the upstream user support ML.
Package: sa-exim
Version: 4.2.1-16
Severity: serious
Control: block -1 by 879687
Hello,
with exim4/4.92-5 I have dropped support for sa-exim:
The dlopen localscan patch in exim4 has been nonfunctional in unstable
for quite some time (4.92~RC2-1/experimental/18 Dec, 4.92~RC3-1
unstable/26 Dec and
10 matches
Mail list logo
