On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 09:53:27PM +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Upstream confirms that an update that handles 32 bit archs is not on the
> radar soon. I don't know what it is the best way forward now, but if it
> is decided that it is ok the ignore the error for 32 bit archs, then I
> can tr
Hi again,
On Mon, 20 May 2019 19:23:40 +0200 Giovanni Mascellani
wrote:
> If we ignore this and just consider the bug as FTBFS, then it is easy to
> patch the package to that failing tests are ignored under 32 bit archs.
> Otherwise, the patch might be more complicated; I prodded upstream on
> th
Hi,
On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 16:46:01 +0200 Andreas Henriksson
wrote:
> The lazy solution here is to argue that we don't want time-bombs and
> just disable the test-suite. The better solution involves generating
> the certificates so that they align with what 32bit machines can handle,
> uuencoding the
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/heimdal/heimdal/issues/533
Greetings from the Gothenburg BSP.
To summarize the above issue:
- certs used in test-suite expired
- upstream regenerated certs with 500 years expiration time set
- this solves the issue on machines with 64bit time_t
but 32bit
4 matches
Mail list logo
