On 06.03.19 08:56, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 11:52:05AM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
>
>> Side note: saving away the artifacts in $AUTOPKGTEST_ARTIFACTS
>> apparently didn't work on Ubuntu's side; the artifacts tarball only
>> contains the usual log files.
>
> I think thi
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 11:52:05AM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 02.03.19 06:42, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 05:39:30PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> >> The logs don't offer that much, so I was planning to upload a 1.6-5 soon
> >> that also saves away all the test a
On 02.03.19 06:42, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 05:39:30PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> The logs don't offer that much, so I was planning to upload a 1.6-5 soon
>> that also saves away all the test artifacts for analysis (it still FTBFS
>> on alpha, for example).
Side note
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 05:39:30PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> > +++ ADD USER KEY
> > +++ PRINT PAYLOAD
> > +++ UPDATE USER KEY
> > +++ PRINT UPDATED PAYLOAD
> > +++ UNLINK KEY> +++ ADD LARGE USER KEY
> > FAILED
> > Unparsable key: 'no'
> > make: *** [Makefile:41: run] Error 1
> > FAILED
> >
Hi Steve,
On 24.02.19 16:12, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I see that since 1.6-3, keyutils now tries to split its autopkgtests between
> those that do require machine isolation, and those that do not.
Just for clarification: I messed this up a bit, the net result was that
both tests were identical in
Source: keyutils
Version: 1.6-4
Severity: normal
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu disco
Hi Christian,
I see that since 1.6-3, keyutils now tries to split its autopkgtests between
those that do require machine isolation, and those that do not. This means
that for the fi
6 matches
Mail list logo
