Hi Norbert,
On 25-01-2019 22:21, Norbert Preining wrote:
> I guess you then have a mixed system of texlive packages installed, some
> from testing and some from unstable. Is this correct?
If nothing forces other versions from unstable, than only the package
that tries to migrate is taken from uns
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019, Paul Gevers wrote:
> testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of
> texlive-base from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from
I guess you then have a mixed system of texlive packages installed, some
from testing and some from unstable. Is
Source: texlive-base, fig2dev
Control: found -1 texlive-base/2018.20190122-1
Control: found -1 fig2dev/1:3.2.7a-3
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of texlive-base the autopkgtest of fig2d
3 matches
Mail list logo
