On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:34:54AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:45:22PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Hi Alastair,
>
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 09:50:30AM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>
>> >Yes, thanka for this patch. I'm reluctant to consider that binaries built o
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:45:22PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hi Alastair,
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 09:50:30AM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> >Yes, thanka for this patch. I'm reluctant to consider that binaries built on
> >armhf failing on arm64 is an _RC Bug_, but its definitely undesir
Hi Alastair,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 09:50:30AM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>Hi
>
>Yes, thanka for this patch. I'm reluctant to consider that binaries built on
>armhf failing on arm64 is an _RC Bug_, but its definitely undesirable.
It's not *yet* RC, but it's going to go that way soon. Our p
Hi
Yes, thanka for this patch. I'm reluctant to consider that binaries
built on armhf failing on arm64 is an _RC Bug_, but its definitely
undesirable.
I'll forward the patch to upstream, and let them optimize it better.
regards
Alastair
On 25/01/2019 18:02, Steve Langasek wrote:
Package:
Package: adios
Followup-For: Bug #919763
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu disco ubuntu-patch
Hi Alastair,
I'm reopening this bug report because I see that you have closed it by
disabling the testsuite.
This is a wrong fix for the issue given that the tests are correctl
Source: adios
Version: 1.13.1-11
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=adios&arch=armhf
...
make check-TESTS
make[5]: Entering directory '/<>/build-mpich/tests/test_src'
make[6]: Entering directory '/<>/build-mpich/tests/test_src'
PASS: copy_subvolume
PASS:
6 matches
Mail list logo
