Bug#919067: Please add a Recommends: on shim-signed

2019-01-13 Thread Steve McIntyre
So, looking through this diff: (holy crap, the grub-installer script is getting big! :-() On that front, I'm *tempted* to say it's time to stop caring about and supporting grub-legacy here, maybe? On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 01:51:41PM +, Colin Watson wrote: >diff --git a/grub-installer b/grub-i

Bug#919067: Please add a Recommends: on shim-signed

2019-01-13 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 05:34:41PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >I'm about to test this lot locally and double-check it DTRT for both >amd64/efi with -signed and i386/efi (without), anyway. And all looks good in both cases. Committing now. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.

Bug#919067: Please add a Recommends: on shim-signed

2019-01-12 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 03:09:57PM +, Colin Watson wrote: >On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 02:20:49PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> I'd possibly do both? grub-installer is one obvious place to make d-i >> add things (and the patch there also looks fairly obvious, roughly >> what I also considered mys

Bug#919067: Please add a Recommends: on shim-signed

2019-01-12 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 02:20:49PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > I'd possibly do both? grub-installer is one obvious place to make d-i > add things (and the patch there also looks fairly obvious, roughly > what I also considered myself), but that *only* works for d-i. If we > add the Recommends: f

Bug#919067: Please add a Recommends: on shim-signed

2019-01-12 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 01:51:41PM +, Colin Watson wrote: >On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 12:58:52PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> NB: Ubuntu doesn't have the depends/recommends here, so I can only >> assume that some other method is used to ensure that shim-signed is >> installed there. I asked Ste

Bug#919067: Please add a Recommends: on shim-signed

2019-01-12 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 12:58:52PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > NB: Ubuntu doesn't have the depends/recommends here, so I can only > assume that some other method is used to ensure that shim-signed is > installed there. I asked Steve Langasek about this, but I've not had > an answer yet. I guess

Bug#919067: Please add a Recommends: on shim-signed

2019-01-12 Thread Steve McIntyre
Package: grub-efi-amd64-signed Version: 1+2.02+dfsg1+9 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi! Working through the last pieces of secure boot support for Buster, I have a working installer build and a working netinst that boot with SB enabled and do all the right things. Yay! The're only one thing miss