control: tag -1 +pending
Hello Simon,
On Sun 30 Dec 2018 at 03:52PM +00, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Maybe "via D-Bus and " or "via D-Bus and sd-login(3)"?
I've committed the latter.
> If a logind provider such as elogind doesn't result in the libsystemd
> sd-login APIs working (at least as well a
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 12:36:31PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 06:28:04PM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > Could you provide an actual diff to be applied to policy.git, please?
>
> Sure, what about:?
>
> diff --git a/policy/upgrading-checklist.rst b/policy/upgrading-checkl
Hello Adam,
On Sun 30 Dec 2018 at 03:39pm +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 02:07:25PM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Ideally, this would be reviewed and seconded by people working on init
>> stuff, so I'm not going to second it myself unless we don't get interest.
>
> I asked
On Sun, 30 Dec 2018 at 15:39:58 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 02:07:25PM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > Ideally, this would be reviewed and seconded by people working on init
> > stuff, so I'm not going to second it myself unless we don't get interest.
>
> I asked around, a
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 02:07:25PM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Ideally, this would be reviewed and seconded by people working on init
> stuff, so I'm not going to second it myself unless we don't get interest.
I asked around, and got the following remark:
Mark Hindley:
} Could you just replace "
Hello Adam,
On Fri 28 Dec 2018 at 12:36pm +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 06:28:04PM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Could you provide an actual diff to be applied to policy.git, please?
>
> Sure, what about:?
Thanks.
Ideally, this would be reviewed and seconded by people wo
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 06:28:04PM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Could you provide an actual diff to be applied to policy.git, please?
Sure, what about:?
diff --git a/policy/upgrading-checklist.rst b/policy/upgrading-checklist.rst
index 679a187..633c14e 100644
--- a/policy/upgrading-checklist.rst
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 at 02:52:09 +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Adam Borowski writes:
> > Thus, the wording would be (as proposed by fsateler):
> >
> > logind: an org.freedesktop.login1 D-Bus API implementation
> >
> > default-logind: should be provided by the distribution's default logind
> > pro
Hello,
On Thu 27 Dec 2018 at 06:36pm +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> As discussed in bug #915407, we'd want a virtual package for logind
> implementations. At present, two packages implement this functionality:
> libpam-systemd and libpam-elogind.
>
> This has been discussed, including a formal pr
Adam Borowski wrote:
> logind: an org.freedesktop.login1 D-Bus API implementation
> default-logind: distribution's default logind provider
Seconded.
I like this description because it doesn't make assumptions about how
many logind implementions there are or which is the current default,
which sh
Adam Borowski writes:
> Thus, the wording would be (as proposed by fsateler):
>
> logind: an org.freedesktop.login1 D-Bus API implementation
>
> default-logind: should be provided by the distribution's default logind
> provider (currently pam-systemd)
So any provider of logind would have to provid
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.3.0.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi!
As discussed in bug #915407, we'd want a virtual package for logind
implementations. At present, two packages implement this functionality:
libpam-systemd and libpam-elogind.
This has been discussed, including a formal pr
12 matches
Mail list logo
