On 2019-10-10 11:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Although the tracker doesn't show any collision, I'd like to finish the
> perl transition first. Please go ahead when perl 5.30 migrates to
> testing. Once uploaded raise the severity of all those FTBFS bugs.
opencv 4.1.2 has landed onto unstable. The mips
Control: block -1 by 915708
Control: block -1 by 915711
Control: block -1 by 915712
On 2019-10-10 11:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> AFAIK opencv 3.x -> 4.x breaks nearly all the reverse dependencies, due
>>> to
>>> API changes or header path change.
>>> I have already filed FTBFS bugs against those co
Control: block -1 by 922566
Control: block -1 by 922569
Control: block -1 by 922570
Control: block -1 by 922573
Control: block -1 by 922574
Control: block -1 by 922578
Control: block -1 by 922579
Control: block -1 by 922582
Control: block -1 by 922583
Control: block -1 by 922584
Control: block -1 b
ping?
On 2019-09-30 09:02, Mo Zhou wrote:
> Hi release team,
>
> Shall we proceed with the opencv transition? The opencv 3.2.0 in
> unstable
> is too ancient. The automatically generated ben file looks good:
>
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-opencv.html
>
> I'm planning to re
Hi release team,
Shall we proceed with the opencv transition? The opencv 3.2.0 in
unstable
is too ancient. The automatically generated ben file looks good:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-opencv.html
I'm planning to remove the mipsel architecture since it suffers
a lot from OOM
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 08:06:57PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
> What is the status with the rdeps? I looked at two bugs and they worry me:
I haven't had enough time to test rdeps for another round. But I guess
the situation would be similar to the first round.
> #915544 suggests the
On 06/01/2019 05:46, Mo Zhou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any updates? Transition freeze is close. The current version of OpenCV
> (3.2.0) in Sid is quite ancient (Dec 23, 2016).
>
> mips{,64}el buildd are again lagging behind the other architectures for
> the last binNMU. And before any ack I'm not going to
Hi pochu,
To make things explicit, do I still have chance to continue with the
opencv transition after the gdal one? And do I need to apply for
freeze exception for opencv?
Hi,
Any updates? Transition freeze is close. The current version of OpenCV
(3.2.0) in Sid is quite ancient (Dec 23, 2016).
mips{,64}el buildd are again lagging behind the other architectures for
the last binNMU. And before any ack I'm not going to manually build it
again on mips box since I'm not
I've uploaded opencv 3.4.5 to experimental which fixed some issues found
in the previous version. This time mipsel and mips64el is still lagging
behind other other architectures. I'll build binaries by myself for the
two architectures and I don't expect any buiid failure.
3.4.5 Will be green on al
OpenCV 3.4.4 is green on all official architectures after uploading
manually built mips{,64}el packages by using Yunqiang's machine.
Shall we move on?
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 01:49:45AM +, Mo Zhou wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:32:36AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > I was going
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:32:36AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I was going to ack this, but I noticed that opencv failed to build on some
> architectures:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=opencv&suite=experimental
>
> Please look at that before we start this.
opencv
On 06/12/2018 13:09, Mo Zhou wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> opencv 3.4.4 introduced new features, bug fixes including CVE fixes.
> I'd like to request for a transition slot.
>
> The rebuild for all
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
opencv 3.4.4 introduced new features, bug fixes including CVE fixes.
I'd like to request for a transition slot.
The rebuild for all reverse build depends has been done locally,
and here
14 matches
Mail list logo
