Oh, so thought I already uploaded it, but I hadn’t. So, I did it just now.
Thanks!
--
Ondřej Surý
> On 14 Nov 2018, at 15:47, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:42 AM Ondřej Surý wrote:
>>> The previous fix was not a real fix, it only rebuilt the package i
Hi Ondrej,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:42 AM Ondřej Surý wrote:
> The previous fix was not a real fix, it only rebuilt the package in a
> non-merged environment.
>
>
> Umm, what?
>
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/php-team/php/blob/master-7.3/debian/patches/0048-Don-t-use-sed-found-by-configure-use
Thanks for the updated patch.
Am 14.11.18 um 15:12 schrieb Felipe Sateler:
> Thanks. Please find an attached patch. However, I don't think this makes
> a practical difference for debian packages, since they run configure
> only once per builddir.
True. That said, I wanted to post it here since I
> The previous fix was not a real fix, it only rebuilt the package in a
> non-merged environment.
Umm, what?
https://salsa.debian.org/php-team/php/blob/master-7.3/debian/patches/0048-Don-t-use-sed-found-by-configure-use-the-sed-command.patch
--
Ondřej Surý
> On 14 Nov 2018, at 14:42, Felipe
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:01 AM Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi Felipe
>
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:42:55 -0300 Felipe Sateler
> wrote:
> > + SED=/bin/sed dh_auto_configure --builddirectory $${target}-build
> $(PARALLEL) -- $$(eval echo \$${$${target}_config}); \
>
> Reading
>
> https://stackover
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 01:27:41 -0800 Kunal Mehta
wrote:
> This is the same regression as #905187 - is there a good way we can
> prevent this from happening again?
Fwiw, reprroducible-builds.org now also contains a merged-usr variation,
which also found this particular problem:
https://tests.reprod
Hi Felipe
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:42:55 -0300 Felipe Sateler
wrote:
> + SED=/bin/sed dh_auto_configure --builddirectory $${target}-build
> $(PARALLEL) -- $$(eval echo \$${$${target}_config}); \
Reading
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13848154/passing-environment-variables-to-autoconfs-
Control: tags -1 patch
Control: user m...@linux.it
Control: usertags -1 usrmerge
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 01:27:41 -0800 Kunal Mehta
wrote:
> This is the same regression as #905187 - is there a good way we can
> prevent this from happening again?
The previous fix was not a real fix, it only rebuilt t
This is the same regression as #905187 - is there a good way we can
prevent this from happening again?
HTH,
-- Kunal
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
9 matches
Mail list logo
