On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 13:16:46 +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 11:59:49PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > That's great news, thanks.
> > Please give us a short ping once the fixed package is available.
> I've just uploaded gdk-pixbuf 2.38.0+dfsg-5. There will be the normal
> dela
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 11:59:49PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> That's great news, thanks.
> Please give us a short ping once the fixed package is available.
I've just uploaded gdk-pixbuf 2.38.0+dfsg-5. There will be the normal
delay, but hopefully this fixes the issue for you.
Cheers,
--
Ia
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 13:42:16 +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> > I tried with
> >
> > #v+
> > --- a/lib/Gtk3.pm
> > +++ b/lib/Gtk3.pm
> > [...]
> > #v-
>
> This diff looks correct to me - I think it could be forwarded upstream
> and/or uploaded.
Thanks!
Uploading right now is a bit difficult as the tes
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 gir1.2-gdkpixbuf-2.0
Control: found -2 2.38.0+dfsg-4
Control: retitle -2 gdk_pixbuf_new_from_inline introspection metadata is broken
Control: forwarded -2 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdk-pixbuf/issues/92
Control: tags -2 + upstream confirmed patch
Contro
Control: tag -1 + confirmed upstream
On Sat, 08 Sep 2018 15:03:13 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> I'm guessing this regressed with gdk-pixbuf 2.38.0+dfsg-1 or so, but I
> haven't verified that (and the ci.debian.net machinery doesn't seem to
> have pinpointed it yet either.)
Sounds plausible; the chan
Source: libgtk3-perl
Version: 0.034-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autopkgtest
Control: block 902557 with -1
As noticed by the autopkgtest checks on ci.debian.net, this package fails
its test suite on current sid, making it also fail to build from source.
http
6 matches
Mail list logo