Hi Brian,
Sorry for the small response delay. ;) This is my only Debian package and I have
let things go for a while now. I'm trying to get back on this.
> Maybe. However it is probably not a bug in xss-lock... How would you
> phrase such a question?
I'm not sure. :D
According to the upstream's
Simon Désaulniers writes:
> Noted. May be that would be worth to formulate as a question to xss-lock's
> upstream too?
Maybe. However it is probably not a bug in xss-lock... How would you
phrase such a question?
--
Brian May
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 04:37:21PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Simon Désaulniers writes:
>
> > Unless there are important issues concerning this request, I don't
> > think that we should do that for reasons I mentionned above. Please,
> > feel free to respond if I'm missing something important
Simon Désaulniers writes:
> Unless there are important issues concerning this request, I don't
> think that we should do that for reasons I mentionned above. Please,
> feel free to respond if I'm missing something important.
:-(
Would you consider this patch? Seems that upstream use "import" no
Hi Brian,
When I first thought about packaging i3lock-fancy, I didn't consider the program
packagable if it would not handle multiple monitors appropriately. At the time,
there was (and there still is) the "dualmonitors" branch which was giving good
results (and still does) so I decided to package
Package: i3lock-fancy
Version: 0.0~git20160228.0.0fcb933-2
Severity: wishlist
Version in Debian unstable is very old, please consider updating to at
least version 0.2, the latest release.
Actually I am somewhat confused, the Debian package seems to contain
functionality to support multiple monit
6 matches
Mail list logo
