Hello,
On Sun 30 Jun 2019 at 10:01PM +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> I no longer think that renaming is needed. I'd like to suggest adding
>> baredebian+git as an alias for baredebian, and writing it immediately
>> after in the docs, i.e.
>>
>> --quilt=baredebian (or its alias --quilt=baredebian+
Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#903392: Bug#931253: Bug#903392: want support for
packaging-only maintainer views"):
> While writing the e-mail I sent a few minutes ago, I lost track of the
> actual concrete suggestion, which was calling baredebian+git just
> baredebian. Sorry about
Hello,
On Sun 30 Jun 2019 at 12:44PM +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Please take a look at wip.baredebian in my chiark repo and see what
> you think of the way the docs read now.
>
> If after reading that you still think it ought to be renamed, I will
> do so.
While writing the e-mail I sent a few min
Hello,
On Sat 29 Jun 2019 at 03:43PM +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#903392: want support for packaging-only
> maintainer views"):
>> On Sat 29 Jun 2019 at 02:55pm +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> > Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#903
Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#931253: Bug#903392: want support for packaging-only
maintainer views"):
> On Sat 29 Jun 2019 at 02:55pm +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I could make baredebian+git an alias for it. Or, rename it. It's not
> > released yet...
>
> I th
Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#903392: want support for packaging-only
maintainer views"):
> On Sat 29 Jun 2019 at 02:55pm +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#903392: want support for packaging-only
> > maintainer views"):
> >&
Hello,
On Sat 29 Jun 2019 at 02:55pm +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Control: clone -1 -2
> Control: retitle -2 want bare-debian tarball-orig quilt mode
> Control: tags -2 - pending
>
> Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#903392: want support for packaging-only
> maintainer views&q
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 want bare-debian tarball-orig quilt mode
Control: tags -2 - pending
Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#903392: want support for packaging-only
maintainer views"):
> On Thu 27 Jun 2019 at 05:23pm +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Secondly:
>
Hello,
On Thu 27 Jun 2019 at 05:23pm +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Are you sure about this conclusion ? Firstly, about "how common": eg,
> the current Linux kernel packages have upstream git.
Probably best not to assume it's more common, if we can avoid that,
indeed.
> Secondly:
>
> If the user
Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#903392: want support for packaging-only
maintainer views"):
> On Sun 19 May 2019 at 11:24pm +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Sean, there is of course the other possibility, where upstream is only
> > a tarball. I propose to intend to suppo
Hello,
On Sun 19 May 2019 at 11:24pm +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Shengjing Zhu writes ("Bug#903392: want support for packaging-only maintainer
> views"):
>> Here's the example for my package, which only has debian dir in
>> debian-branch.
>>
>&
Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#903392: want support for packaging-only maintainer
views"):
> On Sun 19 May 2019 at 11:24PM +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > dgit will look for the corresponding upstream source tag with an
> > algorithm like git-deborig's. In case that doesn&#x
Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#903392: want support for packaging-only
maintainer views"):
> On Sun 19 May 2019 at 11:24PM +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Sean, there is of course the other possibility, where upstream is only
> > a tarball. I propose to intend to suppo
Hello,
On Sun 19 May 2019 at 11:24PM +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sean, there is of course the other possibility, where upstream is only
> a tarball. I propose to intend to support this, eventually, with
> --quilt=packaging-plus-tar
"Sean" is a typo? Not sure what my attention is being drawn
Shengjing Zhu writes ("Bug#903392: want support for packaging-only maintainer
views"):
> Here's the example for my package, which only has debian dir in
> debian-branch.
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/zhsj-guest/anbox
>
> To build, using
>
> gbp clone ht
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:50 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> Here's the example for my package, which only has debian dir in
> debian-branch.
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/zhsj-guest/anbox
>
> To build, using
>
> gbp clone https://salsa.debian.org/zhsj-guest/anbox
> gbp buildpackage --git-export-dir=.
Here's the example for my package, which only has debian dir in
debian-branch.
https://salsa.debian.org/zhsj-guest/anbox
To build, using
gbp clone https://salsa.debian.org/zhsj-guest/anbox
gbp buildpackage --git-export-dir=../build-area --git-builder=sbuild
I'm not sure if I have magic gbp.conf
Package: dgit
Version: 5.7
Severity: wishlist
dgit should support packaging-only maintainer views.
This is like --quilt=unapplied, except that the upstream files are
always directly from the tarball. We will have to fudge the history
of the tarball import, somehow.
I suggest --quilt=packaging-o
18 matches
Mail list logo
