On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 19:12:01 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 15:12:30 +0100 Petter Reinholdtsen
> wrote:
> > I use pdftk regularly, and really hope we can manage to keep it in
> > Debian.
> >
> > Is there a plan for adressing this before gcj is removed?
>
> There's a
On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 15:12:30 +0100 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I use pdftk regularly, and really hope we can manage to keep it in
> Debian.
>
> Is there a plan for adressing this before gcj is removed?
There's a fork that doesn't require GCJ as Adrian pointed out, you could help
package that.
I use pdftk regularly, and really hope we can manage to keep it in
Debian.
Is there a plan for adressing this before gcj is removed?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 09:58:42AM +0100, po...@debian.org wrote:
> Source: pdftk
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid buster
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: gcj-rm
>
> Hi,
>
> pdftk depends or build-depends on GCJ. GCJ has been dropped upstream
> since GCC 7, so we are dropping it fro
4 matches
Mail list logo