Bug#890907:

Hi Adrian, yeah, that didn't work out... If you have time, would you mind looking at our analysis at https://github.com/cisco/cjose/issues/70 where we gathered our findings? Best wishes, Moritz On 20.05.2018 15:36, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 08:39:03PM

Bug#890907: closed by Moritz Schlarb (Bug#890907: fixed in cjose 0.6.0+dfsg1-2~exp1)

Control: reopen -1 On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 08:39:03PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >... > cjose (0.6.0+dfsg1-2~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium >... >* Test upstream patch from > https://github.com/cisco/cjose/pull/71 (Closes: #890907) >... Seems this didn't work: https://

Bug#890907: cjose FTBFS on big endian: test failure

Source: cjose Version: 0.6.0+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=cjose&suite=sid ... FAIL: check_cjose = Running suite(s): CJOSE version util base64 concatkdf jwk jwe jws header 95%: Checks: 62, Failures: 3, Errors: 0 check_version.c:1