On 2017-12-16 08:37 AM, Cédric Dufour - Idiap Research Institute wrote:
> On 16/12/17 10:02, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
>> There is the AppArmor profile not re-enable? What let you came to that
>> conclusion? As written before two commands are needed.
>>
>> $ sudo rm /etc/apparmor.d/disable/profil
Hello,
On 16/12/17 10:02, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
There is the AppArmor profile not re-enable? What let you came to that
conclusion? As written before two commands are needed.
$ sudo rm /etc/apparmor.d/disable/profile.name
$ sudo apparmor_parser -r /etc/apparmor.d/profile.name
It does
Hello Cédric,
Am 15.12.2017 um 12:09 schrieb Cédric Dufour - Idiap Research Institute:
> Hello Debian Security Team,
>
> May I ask that you have a look at bug
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884191
>
> I find it strange a change as significant as the one at hand makes it
> t
Hello Carsten,
On 12/12/17 21:38, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
>>> I think we can implement this change by shipping a symlink to the
>>> profile in /etc/apparmor.d/disable/. My understanding is that dpkg
>>> will treat this removal of a conffile as a change worth preserving on
>>> upgrades, i.e. it wo
Hello Cédric,
I lowered down the severity to wishlist, please see
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 03:49:23PM +0100, Cédric Dufour - Idiap Research
Institute wrote:
> Package: thunderbird
> Version: 1:52.5.0-1~deb8u1
> severity: grave
>
> As stated as com
Package: thunderbird
Version: 1:52.5.0-1~deb8u1
severity: grave
As stated as comment to the bug corresponding to the source of this issue
(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882672):
> I think we can implement this change by shipping a symlink to the
> profile in /etc/apparmor.d/d
6 matches
Mail list logo
