>Side note: Considering that the maintainer of the package has no time
>to care for RC bugs in copyright with patch attached the package might
>be a good candidate for some force-modernise effort.
That's a rather unfair way of phrasing it. I worked closely with
wilmer on this issue, and we didn't
I've integrated the NMU and fixed the rest of the issues with the
copyright file in the following pull request:
https://github.com/bitlbee/bitlbee/pull/127
Please review.
>- It implies all of the names listed hold copyright on most files
This one is just a side effect of how "decopy", the tool
severity 883872 minor
Machine-readable is optional, and although not all attributed by exact
file or directory, everything in the existing file *is* accounted for
(Lintux == me at, hmm, 16 years old, and various files also in lib/
still come from Gaim which is mentioned.)
Patches for a fully comp
Source: bitlbee
Justification: Policy 12.5, 12.5.1
Severity: serious
This package has an extremely incorrect d/copyright file. Additionally, this
file is not machine readable. It also lacks accurate information such as what
"portions" of code a license refers to. Almost none of the copyright
infor
4 matches
Mail list logo
