On 2017-09-07 16:01 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 15:01 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > OK, but we need the kernel-headers package in order build the
> > toolchain, so at least that needs to be built (which is in fact all I
> > have done/tested so far).
>
> Yes, and that's trivial
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 15:01 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> On 2017-09-07 14:46 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Attached are the packaging changes needed to make the kernel build for
> > > arm64ilp32.
> > >
> > > The arm64ilp32 (aarch64-linux-gnu_ilp32) kernel support is not yet
> > > merged upstream, s
On 2017-09-07 14:46 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Attached are the packaging changes needed to make the kernel build for
> > arm64ilp32.
> >
> > The arm64ilp32 (aarch64-linux-gnu_ilp32) kernel support is not yet
> > merged upstream, so I guess you are not going to include this until it
> > is,
Control: tag -1 upstream
Control: tag -1 - patch
Control: notfound -1 4.9.30-2+deb9u2.1
Control: found -1 4.13~rc7-1~exp1
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 04:43 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> Source: linux
> Version: 4.9.30-2+deb9u2.1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Attached are the packaging changes needed
Source: linux
Version: 4.9.30-2+deb9u2.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Attached are the packaging changes needed to make the kernel build for
arm64ilp32.
The arm64ilp32 (aarch64-linux-gnu_ilp32) kernel support is not yet
merged upstream, so I guess you are not going to include this until it
is,
5 matches
Mail list logo
