HI Paul
On Mi 12 Jul 2017 19:09:59 CEST, draeath wrote:
Thanks Mike.
I'm working on the refactor. It'll take me some time to get it done, but
I've absorbed what it's doing and how to accomplish it with the new
bindings.
As soon as I have it tested and verified to work with the other patches,
Sigh, that last instance there should be "python-gpg." These names are
all too similar.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 6:55 PM, draeath wrote:
> let me know if you'd prefer me to use python-gnupg instead
Patch tested on stretch, seems to do the job. Can't imagine it
wouldn't work on testing, too. Unfortunately, by the time I realized
that "python-gpg" and "python-gnupg" are not the same thing, I was
done. Please do let me know if you'd prefer me to use python-gnupg
instead, and I'll be happy to. Th
Thanks Mike.
I'm working on the refactor. It'll take me some time to get it done, but
I've absorbed what it's doing and how to accomplish it with the new
bindings.
As soon as I have it tested and verified to work with the other patches,
I'll send it your way. Will you handle the changes to the co
Hi,
On Do 06 Jul 2017 06:41:08 CEST, draeath wrote:
One month does not seem like a lot of turnaround time for this. Does this
package have an active maintainer? I'm willing to look into updating this
and providing a patch, but I might need some handholding on the process
side. (I'm familiar wi
One month does not seem like a lot of turnaround time for this. Does this
package have an active maintainer? I'm willing to look into updating this
and providing a patch, but I might need some handholding on the process
side. (I'm familiar with casual site-local usage of debuild, but I do not
curre
6 matches
Mail list logo
