On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 06:08:10PM +0700, Arnaud wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> > On the other hand, an upload with two new changelog entries, while mildly
> > unrecommended, is fine -- but it's good to remind the uploader that he or
> > she needs to manually specify "-v0.7-1" when repacking the source as
Hi Adam,
> * New upstream release.
> - - Remove deprecated gnome-common macros/variables. Closes: #929881.
> + - Remove deprecated gnome-common macros/variables. Closes: #829881.
> - Resize icons in menu. Closes: #816124.
> * Remove manual page (now shipped by upstream).
> * Bump Gtk+ required ver
Hi all, sorry for late reply !
>
> > > Done, the watch file seem to work according to `uscan`, but
> > mentors.debian.net says there's a problem. I'm not sure what's wrong.
> >
> > Take a look on [1] as an example, your `watch` file is broken
> > presumably since you're calling `uupdate` directly.
Hello,
> > Done, the watch file seem to work according to `uscan`, but
> mentors.debian.net says there's a problem. I'm not sure what's wrong.
>
> Take a look on [1] as an example, your `watch` file is broken
> presumably since you're calling `uupdate` directly.
>
> [1]https://wiki.debian.org/d
Hi Arnaud.
On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 22:35:01 +0700 Arnaud
wrote:
> Done, the watch file seem to work according to `uscan`, but
mentors.debian.net says there's a problem. I'm not sure what's wrong.
Take a look on [1] as an example, your `watch` file is broken
presumably since you're calling `uupdate`
Hey, anyone willing to sponsor this package ?
This new version makes the build reproducible, and I think it's
something that Debian wants, so... Well, up to you.
Cheers,
Arnaud
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:07:25 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 18:17 +0700, Arnaud wrote:
>
> > Is it a
On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 18:17 +0700, Arnaud wrote:
> Is it a correct way of doing things ?
If the tarball you upload to Debian is bit-for-bit identical to the
tarball you upload to or get from github, then yes, otherwise no.
I used diffoscope to compare the tarball uploaded to github with the
tarb
Hi Paul, thx for the review.
>
>> The package is now built with `gbp` from a git tag. I guess it fixes the
>> problem.
> Please verify that is the case.
Well, I'm not a 100% sure that I'm doing it right here. Let me explain
the situation.
PNMixer switched to CMake, so there is no more 'make dis
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Arnaud wrote:
> mentors.debian.net says there's a problem. I'm not sure what's wrong.
Probably due to the old version of uscan it uses.
> The package is now built with `gbp` from a git tag. I guess it fixes the
> problem.
Please verify that is the case.
> I ha
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pnmixer"
* Package name: pnmixer
Version : 0.7.2-1
Upstream Author : Nick Lanham, Julian Ospald, Arnaud Rebillout
* URL : https://github.com/nicklan/pnmixer
* Licen
10 matches
Mail list logo
