Bug#862470: (pre-approval) unblock: lxcfs/2.0.7-1

2017-05-20 Thread Evgeni Golov
> > As with LXC, I wonder if you would be OK with accepting the latest LXCFS > > stable release into Stretch at this point in time. > > The patch is not as huge (7 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 61 > > deletions(-)) and the reasoning is very much the same: having the best > > possible base for S

Bug#862470: (pre-approval) unblock: lxcfs/2.0.7-1

2017-05-20 Thread Niels Thykier
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Evgeni Golov: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Dear Release Team, > > As with LXC, I wonder if you would be OK with accepting the latest LXCFS > stable release into Stretch

Bug#862470: (pre-approval) unblock: lxcfs/2.0.7-1

2017-05-13 Thread Evgeni Golov
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Dear Release Team, As with LXC, I wonder if you would be OK with accepting the latest LXCFS stable release into Stretch at this point in time. The patch is not as huge (7 files changed, 100