On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 at 14:46:24 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 00:11 +0100, cgzones wrote:
> > I created bug report against dbus 1.10 on Debian [1] due to failing
> > to
> > send policyload notices.
> > Are there any objections or comments on the upstream patch[2]?
>
> Also,
On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 00:11 +0100, cgzones wrote:
> Hi list,
> I created bug report against dbus 1.10 on Debian [1] due to failing
> to
> send policyload notices.
> Are there any objections or comments on the upstream patch[2]?
Also, the patch looks correct to me.
> The patch works for me:
>
> M
On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 00:11 +0100, cgzones wrote:
> Hi list,
> I created bug report against dbus 1.10 on Debian [1] due to failing
> to
> send policyload notices.
> Are there any objections or comments on the upstream patch[2]?
The patch has been working correctly in dbus 1.11 in Fedora for quite
Hi list,
I created bug report against dbus 1.10 on Debian [1] due to failing to
send policyload notices.
Are there any objections or comments on the upstream patch[2]?
The patch works for me:
Mar 14 00:01:36 debianSE audit[441]: USER_AVC pid=441 uid=105
auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295
subj=system_u
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 at 20:52:47 +0100, cgzones wrote:
> on SELinux enabled systems, dbus cannot send the policyload notification.
>
> There is already a thread over at redhat [1], and bug reports at
> redhat [2] and dbus [3].
> Please, cherry-pick the fix from upstream [4].
The reason it's only i
Package: dbus
Version: 1.10.16-1
User: selinux-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: selinux
Hi,
on SELinux enabled systems, dbus cannot send the policyload notification.
There is already a thread over at redhat [1], and bug reports at
redhat [2] and dbus [3].
Please, cherry-pick the fix from u
6 matches
Mail list logo
