Bug#855919: libwrap recommends tcpd

2017-10-15 Thread Christian Göttsche
tags -1 +patch diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 7133e6e..517ff55 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends} Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends} Breaks: tcpd (<< 7.6.q-20) Replaces: tcpd (<< 7.6.q-20) -Recommends: t

Bug#855919: libwrap recommends tcpd

2017-06-19 Thread Christian Göttsche
Any plans for the Buster development cycle?

Bug#855919: libwrap recommends tcpd

2017-05-12 Thread Alan Jenkins
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:01:09 +0100 m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote: > On Feb 23, cgzones wrote: > > > libwrap0 recommends tcpd and as recommend packages are by default > > annexed, tcpd will be installed e.g. for the packages openssh-server > > or auditd. > > Could you consider to lower the bo

Bug#855919: libwrap recommends tcpd

2017-02-23 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Feb 23, cgzones wrote: > libwrap0 recommends tcpd and as recommend packages are by default > annexed, tcpd will be installed e.g. for the packages openssh-server > or auditd. > Could you consider to lower the bonding to suggests? I see no reason at all to keep even a Suggests at this point. -

Bug#855919: libwrap recommends tcpd

2017-02-23 Thread cgzones
Package: libwrap0 Version: 7.6.q-26 libwrap0 recommends tcpd and as recommend packages are by default annexed, tcpd will be installed e.g. for the packages openssh-server or auditd. Could you consider to lower the bonding to suggests?