On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 08:35:47PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> > I don't like the idea of hard-coding a fixed build path requirement into
> > debian policy.
I don't *like* it neither but I think it's the sensible thing to do now.
> > We're over 80% with variable b
Bill Allombert writes:
> This require policy to define the build environment and build
> instruction much more precisely than it does now, which does not seems
> to be practical. Unless maybe if a reference implementation is provided.
I don't see anything in this proposal that would require a mo
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 04:08:47PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> control: user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
> control: usertag = normative proposal
>
> Hello,
>
> Proposal:
>
> This is what Holger and I think we should add to Policy, after
> readability tweaks:
>
> Packages sh
Hi,
Quoting Russ Allbery (2017-08-12 09:57:44)
> I think we need to add all environment variables starting with DEB_* to
> the prerequisites. If you set DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip or
> DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=hardening=all, you'll definitely get a different
> package, for instance.
>
> I feel lik
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> On Fri 2017-08-11 16:08:47 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> - a version of a source package unpacked at a given path;
> I don't like the idea of hard-coding a fixed build path requirement into
> debian policy. We're over 80% with variable build paths in unstable
>
Thanks for the proposal. I like it! A few nit-picks below:
On Fri 2017-08-11 16:08:47 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> - a version of a source package unpacked at a given path;
I don't like the idea of hard-coding a fixed build path requirement into
debian policy. We're over 80% with variable
Sean Whitton writes:
> Proposal:
> This is what Holger and I think we should add to Policy, after
> readability tweaks:
> Packages should build reproducibly, which for purposes of this
> document means that given
> - a version of a source package unpacked at a given path;
Dear Sean & Holger,
Thank you so much for working on this at the end of a tiring DebConf!
> […]
> Later, we could narrow the definition of build environment by adding
> more constraints, but we're not there yet.
That makes sense. Indeed, that even feels like the optimal approach
as it allows fle
control: user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
control: usertag = normative proposal
Hello,
Proposal:
This is what Holger and I think we should add to Policy, after
readability tweaks:
Packages should build reproducibly, which for purposes of this
document means that given
9 matches
Mail list logo
