On 2016-11-10 16:34, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> If you can still reproduce at will, I might like to provide a patch to
>> make sure the fix works for you? If you could test this, probably
>> later today, that'd be awesome!
>
> Ok, it was too trivial to leave alone. :) Attached the proposed patch.
Th
Hi!
On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 16:24:13 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> This appears to be a problem with reportbroken_retexitstatus() in
> src/error.c when printing out the packages affected by the errors, so
> not something dangerous, but still annoying and wrong.
>
> From your backtrace it seems the
Hi!
On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 12:11:51 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.18.13
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
> Control: affects -1 + desktop-base
> during a test with piuparts I noticed a reproducible dpkg segfault
> when install
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.13
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + desktop-base
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed a reproducible dpkg segfault
when installing desktop-base/experimental in a sid+experimental amd64 chroot.
>From the a
4 matches
Mail list logo
