On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:06:50PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Sunday, October 16, 2016 11:48:32 AM CDT Paul Wise wrote:
>...
> > Your upstream isn't naming snapshot tarballs correctly. This should be
> > fixed either in boost upstream
>
> I know this is the popular Debian perception and
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> This should be ... or in the boost watch files. Modifying
> the boost watch file is dependent on the fix for the above issue.
I've now committed the fix, you can use something like this:
version=3
opts="uversionmangle=s/_/./g,dversionmangle=s/
On Sunday, October 16, 2016 11:48:32 AM CDT Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > My suggestion is that the ones with "snapshots" in the path are simply
> > filtered out from list displayed by the reflector as these are not
> > release files.
>
> That sou
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> My suggestion is that the ones with "snapshots" in the path are simply
> filtered out from list displayed by the reflector as these are not
> release files.
That sounds like an ugly hack that I would rather not see implemented.
The are
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
The uscan download from sourceforge doesn't download what you expect
for boost. The reason is that the link provided by the reflector page
[1] is incorrect: it leads to a "snapshot" url [2]. The correct
URL is [3].
Paul Wise indicated [4] that the reflect
5 matches
Mail list logo
