Bug#838941: RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta3-3 ITP

2016-12-23 Thread peter . zahradnik
On 2016-12-17 22:27, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hello, Files: interval_tree.c interval_tree_generic.h Copyright: 2012 Michel Lespinasse License: GPL-2 which then below lists GPL-2 license with address: Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301,

Bug#838941: RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta3-3 ITP

2016-12-23 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:12:04PM +0100, peter.zahrad...@znik.sk wrote: > * Package name: duperemove Uhm guys, what's the status on this? Unless you upload by pretty much today, there's little chance it will get into stretch -- the effective freeze date is in unstable (ie, past NEW) by Dec

Bug#838941: RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta3-3 ITP

2016-12-17 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, >Files: interval_tree.c interval_tree_generic.h >Copyright: 2012 Michel Lespinasse >License: GPL-2 > >which then below lists GPL-2 license with address: Free Software >Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA >02110-1301, USA. >However I can see that in interval_tree

Bug#838941: RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta3-3 ITP

2016-12-12 Thread peter . zahradnik
On 2016-10-31 17:09, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hi, thanks for the review, I've fixed licenses now, can you review again? lets see interval_tree_generic.h: GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address) still wrong (missing the later clause) xxhash.c ^^ wrong license G. This copyri

Bug#838941: RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta3-3 ITP

2016-10-31 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >thanks for the review, I've fixed licenses now, can you review again? lets see > interval_tree_generic.h: GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address) still wrong (missing the later clause) xxhash.c ^^ wrong license G.

Bug#838941: RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta3-3 ITP

2016-10-29 Thread Peter Zahradnik
On 10/18/2016 08:02 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi, > >> Some comments: >> - this is ITP bug so in d/changelog you should have one entry. with >> one version, with Initial release and (Closes: #). >> - in your patch there seems to be so

Bug#838941: RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta3-3 ITP

2016-10-18 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, >Some comments: >- this is ITP bug so in d/changelog you should have one entry. with >one version, with Initial release and (Closes: #). >- in your patch there seems to be some UTF problem in the From: >- can you push pristine tar branches to

Bug#838941: RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta3-3 ITP

2016-09-28 Thread Dariusz Dwornikowski
On 26 September 2016 at 23:12, wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "duperemove" > > * Package name: duperemove >Version : 0.11~beta3-3 Hi, First of all, thank you for your contribution.

Bug#838941: RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta3-3 ITP

2016-09-26 Thread peter . zahradnik
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "duperemove" * Package name: duperemove Version : 0.11~beta3-3 Upstream Author : Mark Fasheh * URL : https://github.com/markfasheh/duperemove * License