Control: severity -1 wishlist
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 at 08:21:13 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
> On 09/19/2016 07:21 AM, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
>> Interesting, worksforme™ both with gawk(1) and mawk(1). Perhaps an
>> issue with TAB vs spaces? Could you redirect the output of `zfs status
>> -P $pool`
On 09/19/2016 07:21 AM, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 at 06:39:35 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
>> On 09/19/2016 04:48 AM, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
>>> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 at 00:51:45 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
On 09/18/2016 02:13 PM, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
>>> Alright, thanks! I t
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 at 06:39:35 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
> On 09/19/2016 04:48 AM, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 at 00:51:45 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
>>> On 09/18/2016 02:13 PM, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
>> Alright, thanks! I think a more robust AWK or sed script is desired to
>
On 09/19/2016 04:48 AM, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 at 00:51:45 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
>> On 09/18/2016 02:13 PM, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> Fair enough it's not the first field, but by looking at the output I
> have the impression that the header is pretty much free form.
Fair
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 at 00:51:45 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
> On 09/18/2016 02:13 PM, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
>> The kernel parameters
>> approach and the /etc/fstab approach are both FS-agnostic, and I'd
>> rather not have FS-specific code to find out which device is mounted on
>> / or /usr.
>
> W
On 09/18/2016 02:13 PM, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 at 19:37:23 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
>> I have changes all ready-to-go for supporting LUKS, but this "bug"
>> (read: feature request) is a blocker. It is possible to work-around this
>> with (otherwise unused) /etc/fstab entrie
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 at 19:37:23 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
> I have changes all ready-to-go for supporting LUKS, but this "bug"
> (read: feature request) is a blocker. It is possible to work-around this
> with (otherwise unused) /etc/fstab entries, but I don't want to
> encourage that in the wild
On 09/17/2016 06:45 PM, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 at 04:32:24 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
>> The attached patch adds ZFS support to cryptsetup.
>
> Thanks the patch. Unfortunately I can't test it easily, and I know
> nothing about ZFS, but I'll try to review your patch anyway.
Hi Richard,
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 at 04:32:24 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
> The attached patch adds ZFS support to cryptsetup.
Thanks the patch. Unfortunately I can't test it easily, and I know
nothing about ZFS, but I'll try to review your patch anyway.
> + zfs list -H -o name,canmount,moun
9 matches
Mail list logo
