On 2022-11-17, Lucas Castro wrote:
> Thanks. = )
Well hi there!
Would you mind me re-uploading without delay or a reduced delay?
live well,
vagrant
> Em 17/11/2022 16:48, Vagrant Cascadian escreveu:
>> Control: tags 834050 pending
>>
>> On 2017-02-15, Chris Lamb wrote:
>>> Lucas Castro wrote:
Thanks. = )
Em 17/11/2022 16:48, Vagrant Cascadian escreveu:
Control: tags 834050 pending
On 2017-02-15, Chris Lamb wrote:
Lucas Castro wrote:
I suppose the patch hadn't fixed the bug.
Ah, try:
--- libpam-ldap-186.orig/vers_string
+++ libpam-ldap-186/vers_string
@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@
Control: tags 834050 pending
On 2017-02-15, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Lucas Castro wrote:
>
>> I suppose the patch hadn't fixed the bug.
>
> Ah, try:
>
> --- libpam-ldap-186.orig/vers_string
> +++ libpam-ldap-186/vers_string
> @@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ if ($ENV{'PROGRAM'}) { $PROGRAM = $ENV{'
>
>ch
On 9/2/20 7:52 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
Hi Lucas,
I'm little busy this days,
If someone could make patch, please make a NMU.
I think I will personally refrain from doing an NMU for such an
important security-related package for this issue, but thank you for
the 'go ahead'.
Indeed, given the i
Hi Lucas,
> I'm little busy this days,
>
> If someone could make patch, please make a NMU.
I think I will personally refrain from doing an NMU for such an
important security-related package for this issue, but thank you for
the 'go ahead'.
Indeed, given the importance of this package, is it ridi
I'm little busy this days,
If someone could make patch, please make a NMU.
On 9/1/20 7:53 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
Chris Lamb wrote:
[..]
Gentle ping on this?
Regards,
--
Lucas Castro
Chris Lamb wrote:
> [..]
Gentle ping on this?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Lucas Castro wrote:
> I suppose the patch hadn't fixed the bug.
Ah, try:
--- libpam-ldap-186.orig/vers_string
+++ libpam-ldap-186/vers_string
@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ if ($ENV{'PROGRAM'}) { $PROGRAM = $ENV{'
chop($AUTHOR);
chop($DATE=`date -u`);
+if (defined $ENV{SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH}) {
Hello,
I suppose the patch hadn't fixed the bug.
It can be check on [1].
[1]
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/diffoscope-results/libpam-ldap.html
Em 04-02-2017 20:54, Lucas Castro escreveu:
>
> Sorry, I hadn't noticed the report.
>
> Tomorrow I'm going to take
Sorry, I hadn't noticed the report.
Tomorrow I'm going to take a loot at it.
--
Lucas Castro
Em 04-02-2017 18:00, Chris Lamb escreveu:
>> this patch and uploading?
> Friendly ping on this :)
>
>
> Best wishes,
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Friendly ping on this :)
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: libpam-ldap
> Version: 184-8.5
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 66 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :'
Source: libpam-ldap
Version: 186-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed
that libpam-ldap could not be b
13 matches
Mail list logo
