> But it looks like ktap is dead upstream now, so perhaps we should just
> remove it from the archive instead?
Sadly, but yes.
So agree, should be just removed from the archive.
Regards,
Azat.
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 14:33:26 +0300 Azat Khuzhin wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 04:20:38PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > Package: ktap
> > Version: 0.4+git20160427-1
> > Severity: serious
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: piuparts
> >
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Thanks for
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 04:20:38PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: ktap
> Version: 0.4+git20160427-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> Hi,
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for detailed report, actually I already had a patch to fix this
[1], but didn't th
Package: ktap
Version: 0.4+git20160427-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
the module FTBFS for the current kernel in testing and unstable:
# less /var/lib/dkms/ktapvm/0.4+git20160427-1/build/make.log
DKMS make.log for ktapvm-0.4+git20160427-1 for kernel 4
4 matches
Mail list logo